Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  996 / 1096 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 996 / 1096 Next Page
Page Background

S980

ESTRO 36

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

192, with a good coverage of the PTV and excellent results

as for acute toxicity. The greater toxicity was observed

immediately after the treatment was finished reducing in

an important way at the third month after treatment.

EP-1784 Needle use in cervical cancer brachytherapy

using the Utrecht applicator: a single center experience

M. Smolic

1

, C. Sombroek

1

, M. Bloemers

1

, B. Van Triest

1

,

M.E. Nowee

1

, A. Mans

1

1

Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek

Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The

Netherlands

Purpose or Objective

The Utrecht applicator (Elekta, Veenendaal, the

Netherlands) used in brachytherapy (BT) for cervical

cancer can include up to 10 interstitial needles along with

the intra-uterine and ovoid channels. The aim of this study

is to examine the clinical use of needles at our institute,

and to investigate whether the two needles with largest

discrepancy between application and use are essential to

treatment planning.

Material and Methods

The study included 22 cervical cancer patients treated

with 3 fractions of BT. The application of needles per

fraction was based on consensus amongst radiation

oncologists, medical physicists and RTTs, using the

available pre-treatment imaging, physical examination

and MRI scan made in the week before BT. We examined

how often each of the 10 possible needles (Figure 1) was

applied and the frequency of its subsequent use in

treatment planning, as well as the average intensity of

each needle’s use, given by the average ratio of needle

channel dwell time to total treatment time. We

investigated whether the two needles with lowest

frequency and intensity are essential for achieving the

planning aims while respecting OAR constraints and

yielding an acceptable conformal dose distribution. We

did this by removing these needles from the optimized

clinical plans (CP) and re-optimizing using the other

available needles, intra-uterine and ovoid channels (RP).

We aimed to obtain identical HR-CTV D90 values while still

trying to achieve similar OAR planning aims and dose

distribution conformality as achieved in the CP. We

compared RP and CP for DVH parameters (HR-CTV D90 and

OAR D2cc’s, as well as the ratio D2cc OAR to D90 HR-CTV

as a measure of DVH parameter favorability) and dose

distributions, characterized by high dose volumes HR-CTV

V200% and V300%, the dose homogeneity index (DHI = 1 –

HR-CTV V150%/HR-CTV V100%) and conformal index (COIN

= HR-CTV V100 (cc)/HR-CTV Volume (cc) x HR-CTV V100

(cc)/Implant V100 (cc)).

Results

Needles C, H, J and A are applied most often (in 89%, 89%,

71% and 67% of the cases, respectively) while the needles

with the lowest frequency of subsequent use are A (64%),

J (68%), F (68%), E (77%). Needles contributing the least to

the total treatment time are J (2.9%), E (2.9%), A (3.0%)

and F (3.5%). Needles A and J are thus applied often but

have the lowest frequency and intensity of subsequent

use. Of the 66 clinical treatment plans in this study, 25

made use of both needles A and J. Re-optimizing these

clinical plans without using needles A and J leads to

minimal differences in DVH parameters and dose

distributions between CP and RP (Table 1)

.

Conclusion

Needles C and H are applied and used most frequently and

intensely in our clinic. Needles A and J are applied often

but have the lowest frequency and intensity of subsequent

use. We managed to obtain equally clinically acceptable

plans without these needles, indicating that they are not

essential to treatment planning and may be discarded in

future.

EP-1785 use of rectal tube in vaginal cuff HDR-

brachytherapy: an unexpected advantage

A. Cerrotta

1

, C. Tenconi

2

, B. Pappalardi

1

, T. Giandini

2

, S.

Naimo

1

, D. Mazzeo

2

, E. Mazzarella

2

, S. Grisotto

2

, M.

Borroni

2

, C. Fallai

1

, M. Carrara

2

1

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori,

Department of diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy-

Radiotherapy 2, Milan, Italy

2

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori,

Department of diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy-

Medical Physics Unit, Milan, Italy

Purpose or Objective

Rectal toxicity, both early and late, is a substantial

problem in gynecological brachytherapy (BT) , occurring

in the majority of patients within the first 2 years after

the end of treatment. Specific strategies and efforts are

needed to limit high doses to the rectal mucosa without

reducing the overall target coverage. The aim of our

study, following an occasional observation, is to evaluate

if the rectal tube we use in our Institute for in vivo

dosimetry allows also a reduction of the rectal dose.

Material and Methods

In our Institute, adjuvant vaginal BT is always Image

Guided (CT/MRI) with a multichannel endovaginal

applicator, chosen taking into account both the comfort

of the patient and the best contact of the applicator

surface with the vaginal mucosa. For all patients, rectal

wall in vivo dosimetry is performed with a dedicated rectal

tube integrated with dosimeters and rigidly fixed to the

endovaginal applicator. Over the time, for technical/

clinical problems, two CT scans (acquired within a time

interval of 10 minutes) were obtained in 6 patients : one

without and one with rectal tube. Each treatment plan

was generated and delivered using CT-scan with rectal

tube in order to calculate dose to target and OARs (TPS:

Oncentra Brachytherapy System). Vaginal cuff, bladder,