Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  277 / 596 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 277 / 596 Next Page
Page Background

A Comparative Evaluation of the 3M

Molecular Detection Assay 2 (MDA 2) –

Listeria

1

monocytogenes

for the Detection of

Listeria monocytogenes

in a Variety of Foods and

2

Environmental Surfaces

3

4

AOAC

Performance Tested Methods

SM

XXXXXX

5

6

Abstract

7

8

The 3M

Molecular Detection Assay 2 (MDA2)–

Listeria monocytogenes

for the detection of

9

Listeria monocytogenes

was evaluated following the AOAC Research Institute

Performance

10

Tested Methods

SM

program guidelines.The evaluation included inclusivity/exclusivity, lot-to-

11

lot/stability, robustness and matrix studies. The 3M MDA2 –

Listeria monocytogenes

was

12

compared to various reference methods for beef hot dogs, deli turkey, raw chicken leg pieces,

13

sealed concrete, plastic, stainless steel, whole melons, bagged raw spinach, romaine lettuce, cold

14

smoked salmon, queso fresco, 4% milk fat cottage cheese, 3% chocolate whole milk and vanilla

15

ice cream in the matrix study.Twenty replicates of each food matrix were analyzed at a low

16

inoculum level of 0.2-2 colony forming units (CFU)/test portion, five replicates were analyzed at

17

a high level of 2-5 CFU/test portion, and five control replicates were analyzed at 0 CFU/test

18

portion with the exception of raw chicken leg pieces. Naturally contaminated raw chicken leg

19

pieces were evaluated using two separate lots consisting of twenty replicates for each lot. All

20

environmental surfaces were analyzed using twenty replicates at a low inoculum level of ~50

21

CFU/

standard

test area, five replicates were analyzed at a high level of ~100 CFU/standard test

22

area, and five control replicates were analyzed at 0 CFU/standard test area. Based on the

23

probability of detection statistical model, there were no statistically significant differences

24

between the number of presumptive and confirmed positive samples or between the candidate

25

and reference method.There were no unexpected results in the lot-to-lot/stability, robustness

26

studies. In the inclusivity/exclusivity study, 50 target organisms and 30 non-target organisms

27

were tested following the 3M MDA2 –

Listeria monocytogenes

method with all target organisms

28

detected and none of the non-target organisms detected. The results of this evaluation

29

demonstrate the specificity and sensitivity of the 3M MDA2 –

Listeria monocytogenes

and its

30

ability to accurately detect

Listeria monocytogenes

in select food matrices and environmental

31

surfaces, 24-30 hours post enrichment.

32

33

Authors

34

Lisa Monteroso and DeAnn Benesh, 3M Food Safety Division

35

Ben Bastin, Jonathan Flannery, Erin Crowley, Patrick Bird, M. Joseph Benzinger, Jr., James

36

Agin, David Goins, Q Laboratories, Inc.

37

38

Submitting Company

39

3M Company

40

Food Safety Department

41

3M Center, Bldg. 275-5W-05

42

St. Paul, MN 55144-1000

43

44

Independent Laboratory

45

Q Laboratories, Inc.

46

AOAC Research Institute

Expert Review Panel Use Only

OMAMAN-30 D/ PTM Validation Report 081501

OMA ERP - June 2016

ERP Use Only