337 / 596
ER1 Yes
Thank You for your comments and review
ER2 Yes
Thank You for your comments and review
ER3 Yes
Thank You for your comments and review
ER4 Yes
Thank You for your comments and review
ER5 Yes
Thank You for your comments and review
ER6 Yes
Thank You for your comments and review
ER1 Yes
Thank You for your comments and review
ER2 Yes
Thank You for your comments and review
ER3 Yes
Thank You for your comments and review
ER4 Yes
Thank You for your comments and review
ER5 Yes
Thank You for your comments and review
ER6 Yes
Thank You for your comments and review
ER1 Yes
Thank You for your comments and review
ER2 Yes
Thank You for your comments and review
ER3 Yes
Thank You for your comments and review
ER4
No, Both the official method and the package
insert need to be revised, as stated earlier in
this review, since they both contain sample
preparation procedures (specifically blending)
that were not validated in either the PTM study
or the OMA study. Once the methods
instructions have been corrected and are
aligned with the validation studies, then I would
recommend approval of the method for First
Action Status
ER5 Yes
Thank You for your comments and review
ER6 Yes
Thank You for your comments and review
Does the method contain adequate safety precaution reference and/or statements?
Recommendation: Do you recommend that the ERP adopt this method as an AOAC Official Method of
Analysis (First Action status)?
Are the references complete and correctly annotated?
OMMAN-29