GAZETTE
MARCH 1981
Education — A Student's View
by
John Fahy
Students' Representative on the Fourth Professional Course
(Written in conjunction with a representative cross-section of Students)
On Tuesday, 14 October 1980, ninety-six apprentices
entered upon the Law Society's Fourth Professional
Course in Blackhall Place. For each of them this marked
a new departure in their careers. The academic side of
their training over, they were now to be introduced to the
law in practice. However, it was to prove an introduction
at a price, the approximate cost of the course being
£1,000. For most of the apprentices this involved obtain-
ing a bank loan, which they will have to repay with
interest over the next few years.
In April 1981 the apprentices having completed the
course will enter their respective master's offices. This is
possibly where the most crucial part of their training will
begin, for it is here that they should become acquainted
with the day to day work of a solicitor. While, for most
apprentices this period proves most beneficial, both from
their own and their master's point of view, unfortunately
this may not be true of all apprenticeships. For some, this
period consists of a long series of frustrations, in which
the apprentice is continually relegated to the most menial
and least educational work in the office. Perhaps if more
masters understood the training which apprentices receive
prior to entering their offices, such frustration for the
apprentice could be avoided.
. It is the purpose of this article, therefore, to outline the
new training scheme, with particular emphasis on the
initial six month course.
The Development of the New Training Scheme
In 1971 the training of lawyers in England was investi-
gated by the Ormrod Committee and suggestions
designed to improve training were put forward. The
Committee recommended that legal education for the
profession be divided into two parts; the academic and the
vocational. The former it was recognised could best be
provided in the university law schools, the latter in voca-
tional law schools.
In 1974 the Incorporated Law Society announced its
decision to revise the system of legal education by which
solicitors were trained. To this end, they accepted sub-
stantially the recommendations of the Ormrod Report.
After consultations with many practitioners, a new
system, to accommodate the vocational side of the
apprentice's training was designed.
This new system envisaged the apprentice spending an
introductory period in the master's office, followed by a
six month course in the Law School at Blackhall Place.
The objective of this course was stated to be the learning
by the apprentice of "the skills needed and procedures
followed by solicitors in the initial years of their profes-
sional lives". The next stage involved the apprentice
returning to his/her master's office for a period of eighteen
months, during which period it would be the master's
duty to give the apprentice as much experience as possible
of the broad spectrum of the solicitor's work. Finally, the
apprentice would complete his training by a final course,
dealing with more advanced topics than the previous one.
A Practice-Orientated Course
The initial six-month course is a "practice-orientated"
one and a list of the subjects covered can be found in the
Appendix to this article. Extensive reliance is placed on
Professor Gullickson's belief that "skills can only be
acquired through performance", and the course is
fashioned around this belief. To this end, a learning-by-
doing approach is adopted, which puts the emphasis on
"doing by the students, with a subsequent appraisal and
correction by the course consultants and tutors".
Aspects of legal procedure are demonstrated by the
consultants through use of hand-outs, audio-visual aids
and practical exercises in which all the students parti-
cipate. Each student's progress is monitored continually
and failure to achieve the required standard in assess-
ments may result in the student having to repeat that
particular part of the course. Punctuality and attendance
are also taken into account in assessments.
Appraisal
While the theory behind the course appears basically
sound, this is not to say that in practice the course works
ideally.
For a start, while the students benefit greatly from the
experience of the one hundred and fifty practitioners
acting as consultants and tutors, it is a fact of life that not
all good practitioners possess the ability to communicate
their particular subjcct. Indeed it must be said that, in a
small number of cases, students detected a distinct lack of
preparation on the part of certain tutors.
29




