Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  308 / 772 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 308 / 772 Next Page
Page Background

18

Multisector funds are an interesting lot. Found in the

Specialty Bond section of

FundInvestor

’s data pages,

they are wide-ranging aggressive funds. They differ

from the core bond Morningstar Category of interme-

diate bond by having

35%

65%

in below-investment-

grade debt. They also tend to invest more overseas.

Most have the flexibility to move around quite a bit,

and the better ones put that flexibility to good use.

Because it’s in the same specialty bin and for

contrast, I’ll also look at

Vanguard Convertible

Securities

VCVSX

.

PIMCO Income

PONDX

Dan Ivascyn has made this a bright spot amid all the

Bill Gross controversy. The fund continues to perform

brilliantly, and investors continue to send money

Ivascyn’s way even as they redeem their shares of

PIMCO Total Return

PTTRX

. The fund is in its

peer group’s top

5%

over the trailing three- and five-

year periods thanks to some very bold moves.

Most important, the fund has about

40%

of assets

in nonagency mortgages. These are mortgages

without government backing that carry higher yields

and much more risk. So far, Ivascyn’s aggression

has handsomely rewarded shareholders. The fund

lost a mere

5

.

8%

in

2008

, but clearly there’s potential

for the fund to get smacked much harder in the

next downturn.

Loomis Sayles Bond

LSBRX

Dan Fuss and team are also enjoying quite a roll; the

fund has top-quartile returns over the past three-,

five-, and

10

-year periods. Fuss is taking on quite a bit

of risk here, though it’s more in the form of high-

yield corporate bonds and foreign debt. Interestingly,

management has been boosting its high-yield expo-

sure and short-term Treasury exposure because it is

generally cautious but felt the early-

2015

energy

sell-off was overdone. That looks like a good call, but

a

30%

weighting in nondollar bonds has hurt the fund

so far in

2015

. The fund lost a hefty

22

.

1%

in

2008

,

so you know the downside is serious. Meantime, the

fund is making a gradual transition in which coman-

agers Matthew Eagan and Elaine Stokes ramp up

their responsibilities.

T. Rowe Price Spectrum Income

RPSIX

This fund is modestly ahead of peers for the trailing

three-year period but only in line with the category for

the past five years. Charles Shriver tactially allocates

assets among

13

T. Rowe bond funds plus

T. Rowe

Price Equity Income

PRFDX

. It’s that last bit,

a neutral

12%

equity weighting, that makes this fund

a little different from peers, though a little like

Vanguard Convertible Securities, which is also influ-

enced by the equity market. The fund lost

9

.

4%

in

2008

.

Fidelity Strategic Income

FSICX

The fund has been in the middle of the pack under

Joanna Bewick for the past three- and five-year

periods, but its longer-term results are strong. Unlike

its peers, this fund doesn’t have much flexibility.

The fund’s neutral weighting is

40%

high yield

(including leveraged bank loans),

30%

U.S. govern-

ment debt (recently split

75%

Treasuries/

25%

mortgages),

15%

emerging markets, and

15%

foreign

developed markets. The fund lost

11

.

4%

in

2008

.

Vanguard Convertible Securities

VCVSX

Run by the venerable Oaktree Capital Management,

this is an appealing fund. Its three-year returns of

11

.

56%

annualized are well ahead of those seen in the

multisector category, but that’s because convertible

bonds behave like a mix of bonds and equities. Rela-

tive to other convertible funds, this fund has been

a laggard in recent years because of its emphasis on

foreign convertibles. However, strong management

and a great long-term track record make this a worthy

choice. The fund lost

29

.

8%

in

2008

, thus illustrating

the downside of that equity exposure.

K

Our Favorite Wide-Ranging Aggressive

Bond Funds

Tracking Morningstar Analyst Ratings

|

Russel Kinnel

What Are Morningstar

Analyst Ratings?

Our ratings are chosen for long-

term success. Analysts assess

a fund’s competitive advantages

by analyzing people, process,

parent, performance, and price.

They do rigorous analysis and

then submit their ratings to a

committee that vets their work

for thoroughness and consistency.