Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  139 / 464 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 139 / 464 Next Page
Page Background

125

JUS COGENS

AND THE QUESTION OF CRITERIA FOR ITS DETERMINATION

the world’s first genocide trial based on United Nations policy, as well as the first trial

of a head of government on a human rights related charge.

The long-lasting horror decimated the whole population, so that only the new

generation was able, after 22 years, to punish the KR functionaries still living (Pol Pot

died in 1998, Ieng Sary in 2013) – with the help of the United Nations, moreover,

which, by treaty, provided the organization and form of this new genocide trial.

42

Cambodia invited international participation due to the weakness of the

Cambodian legal system and the international nature of the crimes. The agreement

with the UN details how the international community will assist and participate in

the

Extraordinary Chambes

. This special new court is a Cambodian domestic court

(ECCC) with international participation that will apply international standards.

43

The ability and willingness of the holder of territorial sovereignty (the State which

has jurisdiction over them) to punish pertinent perpetrators of a crime under

international law is a typical feature of a peremptory norm – thus also that norm

prohibiting committing genocide.

44

At the present time the violators of this concerned prohibition are the radical

Islamic irregular forces of the so-called

Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

(ISIL),

45

which are mostly fighting in Syria and Iraq (genocide of the Yazidis); in Nigeria

they are called

Boko Haram,

46

and in Somalia

al-Shabaab

.

47

These Islamist terrorist

movements have a part of their territory in the countries named under proper

control, and, in relation to the population living there, they are responsible for the

genocidal mistreatment of heterodox persons (that is, ‘convert to Islam or die’) and

for civilian casualties in general.

2.2.2 Crimes against humanity

Up to now, withinChapter 2 (

et supra

), we have dealt with the human being’s inherent

right to life as well as his rights to physical and psychical integrity. Now attention will

be paid rather to human dignity, including humiliation or degradation of a human

being. In respect to this the

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

is rich

42

See

http://legal.un.org/avl/ha/abunac/abunac.html

Here the text of

Agreement between the United

Nations and the Royal Government of Cambodia concerning the prosecution under Cambodian law of

crimes committed during the period of Democratic Kampuchea

(Phnom Penh, 6 June 2003).

43

See

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khmer_Rouge_Tribunal.

44

About this principle see

http://www.pgaction.org/programmes/ilhr/icc-complementarity.html.

The

principle of complementarity respects also the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court,

UNTS, vol. 2187, p. 3; Art. 17 – Issues of admissibility (1). “(…) the Court shall determine that a case

is inadmissible where: (a) The case is being investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction

over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution;

(…)”.

45

See http://

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State_of_Iraq_and_the_Levant.

46

See

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boko_Haram.

47

See

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Shabaab_

(militant_group).