Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  146 / 464 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 146 / 464 Next Page
Page Background

132

JAN ONDŘEJ

CYIL 6 ȍ2015Ȏ

Introduction

Entities which, although they

exhibit many feature of states,

are not recognized

by the majority of states are sometimes described as

de facto regimes.

1

Kosovo,

2

for

example, was not recognized by Russia, China, India and, within the European

Union, by Slovakia, Spain, Greece, Rumania or Cyprus. These states argue that, apart

from the illegitimate separation of a part of a sovereign state, recognition of Kosovo

would support separatist demands in problem regions

3

of their own which they are

worried about. A third kind of state which

refuses

to recognize

de facto regimes

as a

new state deals with this entity as non-existent and still recognizes the

sovereignty

of

the

original state

4

over the separated territory

. Among de facto regimes one

can includ

Taiwan, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic and so on.

1. Subjects of International Law

General international public law does not contain the

concept of subject

and does

not define which persons (entities) can be considered subjects. Only the individual

norms of international public law, namely

international treaties (agreements)

provide

an indirect answer to this question. They list subjects of particular rights and duties.

It is therefore a matter of

investigation

in any particular case what

rights and duties

of

international law are granted to a particular person.

The concept of subject and its enumeration is therefore defined by the

doctrine

of international law. Some authors stress that the subject is that person (entity)

which has the capacity to set standards. Another concept, and it can be considered

as prevailing, arises from the concept of subject as defined by general doctrine of law.

This approach is present both in the Czech doctrine of international law as well as by

foreign authors. According to Dixon,

5

for example, the

subject

of international law is

a person or entity which is capable of

possessing and exercising rights and duties

under

international law. The s

ubject of law

,

also international law, is any entity to which

the given legal framework concedes the capability of

rights and duties

and generally

of

legality

.

As in national law, where various subjects of law are distinguished (individuals,

legal persons, the state) and which differ from each other, there are also subjects of

1

SCHEU, H. Ch. Vznik nového státu a jeho uznání v mezinárodním právu.

Mezinárodní politika

, 2008,

č. 4, s. 6.

2

Podrobněji k otázce Kosova in: POTOČNÝ, M., ONDŘEJ, J.

Mezinárodní právo veřejné

. Zvláštní

část, 6. vydání. Praha: C.H. Beck, 2011, s. 24 a násl.

3

LOSKOT, T. Nezávislé Kosovo uznala za rok od vyhlášení jen čtvrtina států.

Právo

ze 17 února 2009.

4

KOLLÁR, M. Niekoľko úvah k vyhlášeniu nezávislosti a (ne)uznanou Kosova jako nezávislého štátu

z pohľadu medzinárodného práva in:

Ročenka medzinárodného práva

. Bratislava : Slovenská spoločnosť

pre medzinárodné právo při SAV, 2008, s.26.

5

DIXON, M.

Textbook on International Law

. Fourth edition. London: Blackstone Press Limited, 2000,

p. 104.