Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  174 / 464 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 174 / 464 Next Page
Page Background

160

JAKUB HANDRLICA

CYIL 6 ȍ2015Ȏ

Low risk installations

Further, the Vienna Convention envisages the possibility of an Installation

State to exclude any

small quantities of nuclear material

from the application of this

Convention, provided that maximum limits for the exclusion of such quantities have

been established by the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy

Agency; and any exclusion by an Installation State is within such established limits.

The maximum limits shall be reviewed periodically by the Board of Governors.

However, unlike the Paris Convention,

60

the Vienna Convention does not envisage

the possibility to exclude “low risk installations” from the scope of applicability of

the Convention. In particular, this provision might be of importance for some types

of

research reactors

, but also for some types of

small nuclear reactors

.

61

Consequently,

the Amended Vienna Convention contains a new provision

62

which allows such

exclusion, provided that criteria for such exclusion have been established by the Board

of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Conclusions

Since the adoption of the Vienna Convention, the issue of its applicability on

various types of nuclear installations has been a matter of scientific discussions.

When the Convention was drafted, the question of hazards arising from certain uses

of nuclear materials was not yet fully understood. The lack of explicit provisions

concerning these uses in the Convention is due to the fact that, when the Convention

was drafted, the development of nuclear energy was in its infancy, and there was little

concern about activities at the back end of the fuel cycle.

However, most recently, problems have arisen from the disposal of radioactive

waste, the decommissioning of nuclear installations and also from the launching

of new nuclear technologies (

e.g.

floating nuclear power plants, nuclear fission

etc.

)

which again raised questions concerning the applicability of the liability regime of this

Convention to various types of technologies. In this respect, the Amended Vienna

Convention strengthens the existing legal framework and constitutes an appropriate

tool to cope with the challenges discussed in this contribution.

60

The Paris Convention provides in Art. 1 /b/, that the Steering Committee may, if in its view the

small extent of the risks involved so warrants, exclude any nuclear installation, nuclear fuel, or nuclear

substances from the application of this Convention.

61

See RILEY, P. Institutional Challenges to Mini Nuclear Power Plants: A Way Forward, In

Nuclear Inter

Jura 2009,

Toronto: INLA, 2009, at pp. 153-162.

62

Art. I. Par. 2.