Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  45 / 464 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 45 / 464 Next Page
Page Background

31

CRIMES AGAINST PEACE IN NUREMBERG

criminal law for a long time. Therefore, in practice, the IMT took this substance into

account when delivering its conclusions.

Let us have a look more carefully on the particularities of the crimes against peace

in the Judgment of the IMT. As we have seen already, all twenty two

33

defendants

were accused of committing Counts One and Two. Count One, as was said before,

envisages the planning, preparation, initiation or execution of a war of aggression.

It is of interest to study how these acts were performed. Analysis of the Judgments

shows that preparation for war took place in a number of ways. There are seven

key possibilities: 1) military, 2) diplomatic, 3) legislative, 4) political, 5) economical,

6) educational, and 7) media/propagative.

Regarding

military preparation

for a war of aggression, the Judgment in the part

relating to

Goering

directly states that he “was the planner and prime mover in the military

and diplomatic preparation for war which Germany pursued”.

34

Keitel

was responsible for

the formal planning of attacking Greece and Yugoslavia.

35

Raeder,

as a Chief of Naval

Command, conceived the invasion of Norway.

36

The Chief of the National Defence

Section in the High Command,

Jodl

, was instructed by Hitler to keep upmilitary pressure

against Austria. He is also responsible for planning the attack on Czechoslovakia.

37

Seyss-

Inquart

participated in the Nazi intrigue which preceded the German occupation of

Austria and was made Chancellor of Austria as a result of German threats of invasion.

38

It was proved that

Goering

was in charge of

diplomatic preparation

for aggressive

war.

39

He attended a number of important conferences which led to the political and

military power of Nazi Germany. As a Minister of Foreign Affairs,

von Neurath

advised

Hitler to withdraw from the Disarmament Conference and the League of Nations in

1933. He informed the Czechoslovakian Minister that Germany intended to abide

by its arbitration convention with Czechoslovakia. In addition, he participated in the

last phase of the negotiations preceding the Munich Pact.

40

The next important element of the commission of the crime against peace was

enacting of legislation

supporting the aims of Nazi powers. Being a Reichs Minister

without Portfolio,

Hess

had the authority to approve all legislation in Germany. In this

position, he was an active supporter of preparations for war, in particular by means of

33

Robert Ley

committed suicide within a week of the Trial being commenced. The list also does not

include

Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler,

and

Joseph Goebbels

. All of them had committed suicide in the

spring of 1945, before the indictment was signed.

34

Judgement: Goering. URL:

<http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/judgoeri.asp

> [cit. 2015-08-11].

35

Judgement: Keitel. URL:

<http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/judkeite.asp

> [cit. 2015-08-11].

36

Judgement: Raeder. URL:

<http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/judraede.asp

> [cit. 2015-08-11].

37

Judgement: Jodl. URL: <

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/judjodl.asp

> [cit. 2015-08-11].

38

Judgement: Seyss-Inquart. URL:

<http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/judseyss.asp

> [cit. 2015-08-11].

39

Judgement: Goering, cited above.

40

Judgement: von Neurath. URL:

<http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/judneur.asp

> [cit. 2015-08-11].