31
CRIMES AGAINST PEACE IN NUREMBERG
criminal law for a long time. Therefore, in practice, the IMT took this substance into
account when delivering its conclusions.
Let us have a look more carefully on the particularities of the crimes against peace
in the Judgment of the IMT. As we have seen already, all twenty two
33
defendants
were accused of committing Counts One and Two. Count One, as was said before,
envisages the planning, preparation, initiation or execution of a war of aggression.
It is of interest to study how these acts were performed. Analysis of the Judgments
shows that preparation for war took place in a number of ways. There are seven
key possibilities: 1) military, 2) diplomatic, 3) legislative, 4) political, 5) economical,
6) educational, and 7) media/propagative.
Regarding
military preparation
for a war of aggression, the Judgment in the part
relating to
Goering
directly states that he “was the planner and prime mover in the military
and diplomatic preparation for war which Germany pursued”.
34
Keitel
was responsible for
the formal planning of attacking Greece and Yugoslavia.
35
Raeder,
as a Chief of Naval
Command, conceived the invasion of Norway.
36
The Chief of the National Defence
Section in the High Command,
Jodl
, was instructed by Hitler to keep upmilitary pressure
against Austria. He is also responsible for planning the attack on Czechoslovakia.
37
Seyss-
Inquart
participated in the Nazi intrigue which preceded the German occupation of
Austria and was made Chancellor of Austria as a result of German threats of invasion.
38
It was proved that
Goering
was in charge of
diplomatic preparation
for aggressive
war.
39
He attended a number of important conferences which led to the political and
military power of Nazi Germany. As a Minister of Foreign Affairs,
von Neurath
advised
Hitler to withdraw from the Disarmament Conference and the League of Nations in
1933. He informed the Czechoslovakian Minister that Germany intended to abide
by its arbitration convention with Czechoslovakia. In addition, he participated in the
last phase of the negotiations preceding the Munich Pact.
40
The next important element of the commission of the crime against peace was
enacting of legislation
supporting the aims of Nazi powers. Being a Reichs Minister
without Portfolio,
Hess
had the authority to approve all legislation in Germany. In this
position, he was an active supporter of preparations for war, in particular by means of
33
Robert Ley
committed suicide within a week of the Trial being commenced. The list also does not
include
Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler,
and
Joseph Goebbels
. All of them had committed suicide in the
spring of 1945, before the indictment was signed.
34
Judgement: Goering. URL:
<http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/judgoeri.asp> [cit. 2015-08-11].
35
Judgement: Keitel. URL:
<http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/judkeite.asp> [cit. 2015-08-11].
36
Judgement: Raeder. URL:
<http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/judraede.asp> [cit. 2015-08-11].
37
Judgement: Jodl. URL: <
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/judjodl.asp> [cit. 2015-08-11].
38
Judgement: Seyss-Inquart. URL:
<http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/judseyss.asp> [cit. 2015-08-11].
39
Judgement: Goering, cited above.
40
Judgement: von Neurath. URL:
<http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/judneur.asp> [cit. 2015-08-11].