![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0044.png)
30
ALLA TYMOFEYEVA
CYIL 6 ȍ2015Ȏ
under Count Two, the tribunal named a number of the acts of aggression concerning
certain European states
29
without any delineation.
30
We will obtain no any further information regarding the specifics of the
crimes against peace in the notion of Article 6 of the Charter. The IMT or the
other international body did not elaborate any explanatory notes comparable to
the Elements of Crimes
31
of the International Criminal Court (hereinafter also
the ‘ICC’). Nevertheless, it is possible to derive them from the Judgment and the
Charter. If we have a look at the explanation given in the ICC’s Elements of Crimes
in respect of Article 8
bis
(crime of aggression), which could be called ‘modern’ crime
against peace, we may find some similarities. There are six main elements,
32
and the
first of them is actually identical to Count One of the indictment of the Trial. As to
the second element, there is a requirement of the status of the perpetrator allowing
him/her effectively to exercise control over the political or military action. The Trial
and documents related to it did not directly envisage this condition. However, its
title spoke of the major criminals, which can be understood as similar in position.
All the other elements of the crime of aggression deal with the Charter of the
United Nations. As far as the United Nations and the IMT were established almost
simultaneously, no reference to this document is found at the Judgment of the IMT’s
Charter. Nonetheless, the content of these elements has been known in the theory of
29
Acts under Count Two against Poland, 1 September 1939; against the United Kingdom and France,
3 September 1939; against Denmark and Norway, 9 April 1940; against Belgium, the Netherlands, and
Luxembourg, 10 May 1940; against Yugoslavia and Greece, 6 April 1941; against the U.S.S.R., 22 June
1941; and against the United States of America, 11 December 1941.
30
Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Vol. 1. Indictment: Count Two. URL:
<http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/count2.asp> [cit. 2015-08-10].
31
The Elements of Crimes are reproduced from the Official Records of the Assembly of States Parties
to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, First session, New York, 3-10 September
2002 (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.03.V.2 and corrigendum), part II.B. The Elements of
Crimes adopted at the 2010 Review Conference are replicated from the Official Records of the Review
Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Kampala, 31 May – 11 June 2010
(International Criminal Court publication, RC/11).
32
Elements of the Crime of aggression (Article 8 bis):
1. The perpetrator planned, prepared, initiated or executed an act of aggression.
2. The perpetrator was a person in a position effectively to exercise control over or to direct the political
or military action of the State which committed the act of aggression.
3. The act of aggression – the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity
or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the
United Nations – was committed.
4. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established that such a use of armed force
was inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations.
5. The act of aggression, by its character, gravity and scale, constituted a manifest violation of the
Charter of the United Nations.
6. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established such a manifest violation of
the Charter of the United Nations.