Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  47 / 464 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 47 / 464 Next Page
Page Background

33

CRIMES AGAINST PEACE IN NUREMBERG

held daily press conferences to deliver the directives of the Propaganda Ministry on

the subject. A similar role was also played by

Funk

. He was made Press Chief in the

Reich Government, and later Under Secretary in the Ministry of Propaganda. As a

leading figure in the various Nazi organisations, he took a number of steps to control

the press, publishing houses, films and music.

50

The mentioned delineation is, of course, only theoretical. The defendants perpetrated

the crimes against peace by means of a few functions, as seen in the examples of Funk,

Goering and many others. Furthermore, it may be hard to distinguish between

diplomatic and political or educational and media/propagative preparation. In

addition, politics interpenetrated all the activities in the country. It is also clear

that without financial support none of the Reich plans could be fulfilled.

The Judgment does not help us to find an answer to the question whether one

kind of preparation for war is worse than another and whether one of these elements

is sufficient to create the crime. It is also not clear whether it is possible to make

such a direct differentiation. Nonetheless, what is absolutely clear is that the Trial in

Nuremberg influenced the theory of international criminal law. Let us gaze on what

further steps were taken by the states and international organisations in the way of

improvement of criminal justice on a worldwide level.

4. Further development

In the current short section it would be impossible to research all the sources of

international criminal law from 1945 to 2015. The last seventy years brought many

changes to our global society. It is true that states are still separated and we cannot speak

about a president of the world, a world parliament or a worldwide court. Nonetheless,

on the level of the United Nations, the organisation which unites almost all countries

in the world, there are a number of bodies playing an exceptional role in the formation

of an international vision. One of these bodies is the International Law Commission

(hereinafter also the ‘ILC’).

For almost seventy years, the ILC has produced many pieces of legislation, including

those in the area of criminal law. The most interesting for us, given the subject

of this article, are the

Principles of International Law recognized in the Charter of the

Nürnberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal

of 1950

51

(hereinafter also the

‘Principles’) and the

Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind

of

1954,

52

which was amended in 1996

53

(hereinafter also the ‘Code’). We are going to

50

Judgement: Funk, cited above.

51

Principles of International Law recognized in the Charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal and in the

Judgment of the Tribunal.

Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1950

, vol. II.

52

Draft Code of Offences against the Peace and Security of Mankind.

Yearbook of the International Law

Commission, 1954

, vol. II.

53

Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind.

Yearbook of the International Law

Commission, 1996

, vol. II, Part Two.