Previous Page  149 / 200 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 149 / 200 Next Page
Page Background

MAY, 1939]

The Gazette of the Incorporated Law Society of Ireland

remarks on the subject have received the

cordial approval of the profession through

out Eire, and as a result of representations

made by

the Council,

the Minister

for

Justice has arranged to meet a deputation

from the Council on this matter, and it is

hoped that something will be done to rectify

a thoroughly unsatisfactory situation which,

if it develops further, is certain to result in

confusion, delay and inefficiency, and to

seriously interfere with the administration

of Justice in the Circuit Court.

A similar case has now arisen as a result

of the death of the District Probate Registrar

at Waterford. Under the Court Officers

Act the Minister for Justice may transfer

the duties of this Office

to the County

Registrar. Strong representations have been

received from the local practitioners as to

the undesirability, loss and inconvenience

which would result if such a transfer were

effected in that District, and your Council

have given these protests their fullest support

and taken steps to bring them to the notice

of the Minister for Justice and the Probate

Judge.

Another matter which has engaged the

attention of your Council is the insufficiency

•of the clerical staff allocated to the Offices

of the Justices of the Dublin Metropolitan

District Courts. There has been no increase

for some years in the clerical staff allocated

to these Offices, while during that time the

volume of office work to be dealt with has

increased to a very great extent as a result

of

legislation passed

in

the meantime.

The Road Traffic Act,

to give only one

example, entails an enormous amount of

extra work, and the existing staff has now to

deal not only with the clerical assistance

required by the three City Justices, but, also

when necessary, of the Justices allocated to

the large District covered by County Dublin

area. When the amount of work involved

in issuing summonses, entering Civil Bills,

checking Decrees, taking and copying deposi

tions, and other matters

in

these busy

districts is considered, it will be obvious

that the office staff cannot satisfactorily

cope with it. This is a matter of grave

concern to the Commercial interests of the

City and County, and unless remedied will

lead

to confusion and delay with

the

inevitable disadvantages incidental thereto.

The Council addressed to the Minister for

Justice a communication on this subject,

and as a result has received a reply stating

that appropriate steps have already been

taken with a view to supplementing the

present staff in that office, but that some

little delay must inevitably take place in

making

appointments. The matter will

continue to engage the attention of your

Council.

A recent reference by a Judge of the High

Court on Circuit for the hearing of Appeals

as to the amount of the Circuit Court costs

in a case which came before him attracted

considerable attention not only in the public

press but in Dail Eire. As the question of

Circuit Court costs may in the near future

be the subject matter of reconsideration I

do not, at the moment, propose to refer

further to the particular case under notice,

but in fairness to our profession I think it

right to prevent any misapprehension as to

the position. Of all Officials connected with

conduct of a lawsuit, whether in the Circuit

or High Court, the Solicitor concerned is

the only one who comes into direct contact

with

the

litigant. He has

to

institute

the proceedings, arrange for the preparation

of necessary proofs, procure the attendance of

witnesses and generally make all arrange

ments necessary for the proper presentation

of the suit to the Court, and should there be

any neglect or even lack of judgment in

these matters it is the Solicitor who has to

accept responsibility and bear the blame if

!

matters do not go right.

In cases involving

substantial amounts the outlay incidental to

a proper presentation of

the case must

necessarily be heavy, and such outlay must

be included in the Solicitor's bill.

In the

result the total amount is referred to as

" costs," and little regard ever seems to be

paid to the very substantial out-of-pocket

expenses included in these bills, and which

expenses, in fact, form no part at all of the

profit remuneration accruing to the Solicitor

concerned in the matter.

I think it desirable

that this point should be emphasised, and

that it should be made clear that the

Solicitors' profession is not by any means the

only one concerned when the word " costs "

is used in such general terms.

Complaints having reached your Council

of what the profession consider undue delay