Previous Page  8 / 69 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 69 Next Page
Page Background

Simon Storage Ltd – Immingham East Terminal

Gasoline Import – Layers of Protection Analysis

P & I Design Ltd

DOCUMENT NO: SI057001_RPT

2 Reed Street, Thornaby, UK, TS17 7AF

ISSUE: G DATE: 29.06.12

Tel: + 44 (0)1642 617444

PAGE 8 OF 34

Fax: + 44 (0)1642 616447

www.pidesign.co.uk

3

LAYER OF PROTECTION ANALYSIS (LOPA)

The technique analyses risks which have been identified associated with the defined

operations. The event likelihood for the identified scenarios are assessed as well as the

consequences both in safety and environmental terms. The consequence of the failure

determines the risk reduction required.

The term LOPA (Layer of Protection Analysis) is applied to a family of techniques used for

carrying out a simplified quantified risk assessment of a defined hazardous scenario. LOPA

is often used to identify the shortfall in meeting a predetermined dangerous failure target

frequency. This shortfall, if it exists, is associated with the average probability of failure on

demand of a safety function required to meet the target dangerous failure frequency. The

identified shortfall (if it exists) is equated to the required SIL of a safety instrumented

function (SIF), as defined in BS EN 61511. This potential shortfall is referred to as the Risk

Reduction Factor (RRF) or the failure rate that should be achieved by the SIS. The link

between the RRF factor and the required SIL is shown in Table 1.

Safety Integrity Level Range of Average PFD

Range of RRF

1

10

-2

≤ PFD < 10

-1

100 ≥ RRF > 10

2

10

-3

≤ PFD < 10

-2

1000 ≥ RRF > 100

3

10

-4

≤ PFD < 10

-3

10000 ≥ RRF > 1000

4

10

-5

≤ PFD < 10

-4

100000 ≥ RRF > 10000

Table 1 - Definitions of SILs for Demand Mode of Operation from IEC 61511-1

3.1

Independent Protection Layers