Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  147 / 453 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 147 / 453 Next Page
Page Background

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

Page 5 of 13

the candidate method’s “confirmation stage” (confirmed) results (POD

CC

) at each

level of inoculation in order to attain a difference in POD for the two stages

(dPOD

CP

) at each level of inoculation. A 95% confidence interval was also

calculated for each dPOD

CP

value that was calculated, and was used to determine

whether

the “screening stage” results is

significantly different from the

“confirmation stage” results for each level of inoculation. According to the

methodology, if the 95% confidence interval of a dPOD

CP

value does not contain

zero, then the difference between the POD

CP

and the POD

CC

of the candidate

method at that level of inoculation is statistically significant at the 5% level. In

addition to these analyses, the rate of true positives (samples with a “screening

stage” positive result and “confirmation stage” positive result), the rate of true

negatives (samples with a “screening stage” negative result and “confirmation

stage” negative result), the rate of false positives (samples with a “screening stage”

positive result and “confirmation stage” negative result), and the rate of false

negatives (samples with a “screening stage” negative result and “confirmation

stage” positive result)

were calculated. Additionally, PODs were calculated for the

reference method’s “confirmed” results (POD

R

) at each level of inoculation and

were compared to the PODs that were calculated for each level of inoculation for

the candidate method where the “screening stage” and “confirmation stage” results

were both positive for a particular sample (POD

C

). The difference in POD for the

two values at each level of inoculation were calculated (dPOD

C

) along with its

corresponding 95% confidence interval. As noted above, if the 95% confidence

interval of a dPOD

C

value does not contain zero, then the difference between the

POD

C

of the candidate method and the POD

R

of the reference method at that level

of inoculation is statistically significant at the 5% level.

3.0 RESULTS

The objective of this study was to validate the 3M

TM

MDA for the detection of

E.

coli

O157:H7 in frozen blueberries. The inoculum concentration of

E. coli

O157:H7 was determined from Most Probable Number analysis, along with the

95% confidence intervals, as shown in Table 1. These inoculation levels

targeted were chosen in order to meet the targeted POD values for the different

inoculation levels. The concentrations achieved through inoculation were found

to be 1.700 x 10

-2

MPN/g for the high inoculation level and 1.305 x 10

-2

MPN/g for

the low inoculation level, according to the MPN analysis (Table 1).

All data obtained for the candidate method testing of frozen blueberries,

‘screening stage’ and ‘confirmation stage’ (25 g frozen blueberry analyzed by

3M

TM

MDA) is provided in Table 2. All data obtained for the reference method

testing of frozen blueberries (25 g frozen blueberry analyzed by the FDA BAM

Ch. 4A) is provided in Table 3. The number of true positives (samples with a