156-157 / 453
SAN ANTONIO
DALLAS-FORT WORTH
PHOENIX
GREEN BAY
ATLANTA
FRESNO
LOS ANGELES
COLUMBUS
888.525.9788 |
WWW.FSNS.COMTable 5. POD
CP
, POD
CC
, and dPOD
CP
Values for the Candidate Method (25 g Frozen Blueberries Analyzed via the
3M
TM
MDA) and POD
R
, POD
C
, and dPOD
C
Values for Candidate Method vs. the Reference Method (25 g Frozen
Blueberries Analyzed via the FDA BAM Ch. 4A)
1
1. POD
CP
, Probability of Detection for Candidate Method “Screening Stage” Positive Results; POD
CC
, Probability of Detection for Candidate Method “Confirmation Stage”
Results; dPOD
CP
, POD
CP
Minus POD
CC
; POD
R
, Probability of Detection for Reference Method Confirmed Results; POD
C
, Probability of Detection for Candidate Method
Confirmed Results (i.e. Combined “Screening Stage” and “Confirmation Stage” Results); dPOD
C
, POD
R
Minus POD
C
. 95% Confidence Interval Values are Generated from
the AOAC International POD Calculator.
Method / Inoculation Level
Measure Value
95% CI
POD
CP
1.000 (0.5655, 1.000)
POD
CC
1.000 (0.5655, 1.000)
dPOD
CP
0.000 (-0.434, 0.434)
POD
CP
0.400 (0.2188, 0.6134)
POD
CC
0.400 (0.2188, 0.6134)
dPOD
CP
0.000 (-0.280, 0.280)
POD
CP
0.000 (0.000, 0.4345)
POD
CC
0.000 (0.000, 0.4345)
dPOD
CP
0.000 (-0.434, 0.434)
POD
R
1.000 (0.5655, 1.000)
POD
C
1.000 (0.5655, 1.000)
dPOD
C
0.000 (-0.434, 0.434)
POD
R
0.400 (0.2188, 0.6134)
POD
C
0.400 (0.2188, 0.6134)
dPOD
C
0.000 (-0.280, 0.280)
POD
R
0.000 (0.000, 0.4345)
POD
C
0.000 (0.000, 0.4345)
dPOD
C
0.000 (-0.434, 0.434)
Reference Method vs. Candidate Method Un-inoculated
Candidate Method Screening vs. Confirmation High Level Inoculation
Candidate Method Screening vs. Confirmation Low Level Inoculation
Candidate Method Screening vs. Confirmation Un-inoculated
Reference Method vs. Candidate Method High Level Inoculation
Reference Method vs. Candidate Method Low Level Inoculation