Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  363 / 453 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 363 / 453 Next Page
Page Background

QIAGEN

mericon

®

E. coliO157 Screen Plusand

mericon

®

E.coli

STEC O-Type Detection Workflows:

AOAC

Performance Tested Methods

SM

101503 and 101504

Abstract

The QIAGEN

mericon

®

E. coli O157 Screen Plus and

mericon

®

E.coliSTEC O-TypePathogen

Detection workflowsemploy Real-Time (RT) PCR technology incorporating a HotStarTaq

DNA Polymerase for the rapid, accurate detection of

Escherichia coli

O157 and non-O157

Shiga toxin-producing

E. coli

STEC(O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145)from selected food

products. In this study, both

mericon

workflows were evaluated according to current AOAC

guidelines. The validation consisted of inclusivity, exclusivity, robustness, and a method

comparison study of three food matrixes. The performance of the

mericon

pathogen

detection workflows, using manual and automated DNA extraction procedures, was

compared to Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual (FDA/BAM)

Chapter 4A:

Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli

for fresh spinach, the United States Department

of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook

(USDA/FSIS-MLG) 5.09:

Detection, Isolation and Identification of Escherichia coli O157:H7

from Meat Products and Carcass and Environmental Sponges

for raw ground beef (70%

lean), or the USDA/FSIS-MLG 5B.05:

Detection and Isolation of non-O157 Shiga Toxin-

Producing Escherichia coli (STEC) from Meat Products and Carcass and Environmental

Sponges

for raw beef trim.

For the inclusivity and exclusivity evaluation, both

mericon

pathogen detection assays

correctly identified all 50 target organism isolates and correctly excluded all 30 non-target

organismsanalyzed.

In the method comparison study, both the

mericon

E.coliScreen PlusAssay and the

mericon

E. coliSTEC O-Type Assay with manual and automated DNA extraction

demonstrated no significant differences between presumptive and confirmed results

(dPOD

CP

) or between candidate and reference method results (dPOD

C

) for all 3 food

matrixesafter 10 hours of enrichment.

Robustness testing demonstrated that minor variations in manual heat lysis time and

sample master mix volume ratios for the

mericon

detection assays did not impact assay

accuracy. The robustness testing did demonstrate that variations in incubation time did

directly impact the assay. Based on the results obtained, it was determined that a minimum

of 10 hours of incubation is needed.

The results of these studies demonstrate adequate sensitivity and selectivity of the

mericon

E.coliO157 Screen Plus and

mericon

E. coliSTEC O-Type Assays with manual and

automated DNA extraction for the detection of

E. coli

O157:H7 and non-O157 STEC

(

O26,

O45, O103, O111, O121, O145

)

in fresh spinach, raw ground beef, and raw beef trim.

OMAMAN-36 E/ AOAC PTM Report

ERP Use Only

January 2017

AOAC Research Institute

Expert Review Panel Use Only