Background Image
Previous Page  42 / 104 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 42 / 104 Next Page
Page Background

42

fertility were estimated at 22 kg nitrogen (N), 3 kg phosphorus

(P), and 15 kg potassium (K) per ha. In Zimbabwe, soil erosion

alone results in an annual loss of N and P totalling US$1.5 billion.

In South Asia, the annual economic loss is estimated at US$600

million for nutrient loss by erosion, and US$1,200 million from

soil fertility depletion (Stocking, 1986; UNEP, 1994).

Erosion is very significant in land degradation. On a global

scale, the annual loss of 75 billion tonnes of soil costs the world

about US$400 billion/year (at US$3/tonne of soil for nutrients

and US$2/tonne of soil for water), or approximately US$70/

person/year (Lal, 1998). It is estimated that the total annual

cost of erosion from agriculture in the US is about US$44 bil-

lion/year or about US$247/ha of cropland and pasture (Lal,

1998). In Sub-Saharan Africa it is much larger; in some coun-

tries productivity has declined in over 40% of the cropland area

in two decades while population has doubled. Overgrazing of

vegetation by livestock and subsequent land degradation is a

widespread problem in these regions.

The productivity of some lands has declined by 50% due to soil

erosion and desertification (Figure 16). Yield reduction in Afri-

ca due to past soil erosion may range from 2–40%, with a mean

loss of 8.2% for the continent. Africa is perhaps the continent

most severely impacted by land degradation (den Biggelaar

et

al

., 2004; Henao and Baanante, 2006), with the global aver-

age being lower, possibly in the range of 1–8%. With increasing

pressures of climate change, water scarcity, population growth

and increasing livestock densities, these ranges will be prob-

ably conservative by 2050.

Sub-Saharan Africa is particularly impacted by land degradation.

In Kenya, over the period 1981–2003, despite improvements in

woodland and grassland, productivity declined across 40% of

cropland – a critical situation in the context of a doubling of the

human population over the same period (Bai and Dent, 2006).

In South Africa, production decreased overall; 29% of the coun-

try suffered land degradation, including 41% of all cropland

(Bai and Dent, 2007a); about 17 million people, or 38% of the

South African population, depend on these degrading areas.

(Source: Bai and Dent, 2007).

Kenya land use and rain-use efficiency

Trend in biomass in 1981–2003

(left) and in rain-use efficiency

(RUE) in 1981–2002 (right).

De-

creases in RUE could be due to

various factors, including degra-

dation and run-off, soil evapora-

tion, increasing depleted soils,

overgrazing by livestock or other

forms of range degradation.

Left map

Red

Yellow

Green

Purple

Blue

Right map

Red

Yellow

Green

urban

cropland

grassland

woodland

water

major decline

moderate decline

improvement

Courtesy of ISRIC, Bai ZG and Dent DL (2006)