Previous Page  40 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 40 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

38

MODERN MINING

May 2016

MODULAR PLANTS

feature

A

ccording to Westcott, the ben-

efits of modular plants are well

established. “Being pre-engi-

neered, the manufacturing lead

time is much shorter than with

conventional fixed plants and the time span

from a client placing an order to the plant be-

ing erected on site and commissioned can be

as little as 12 to 16 weeks compared to per-

haps a year to 18 months, or even more, for a

conventional facility,” he says. “This is with-

out a doubt one of the key benefits of modu-

larisation as most juniors – who constitute the

prime market for modular plants – are usually

working with limited budgets and need early

access to cash flow. Moreover, the capital cost

of modular plants is normally much less than

with fixed plants and the operating costs are

generally lower.”

Westcott adds that modular plants are per-

fect for the modern mining scene, where small

and/or marginal deposits with limited lives

are increasingly being exploited. “If you have

a deposit with a limited life, you naturally

want to limit your capex and build a lean, fit-

for-purpose plant that maximises your return

– and which can also be relocated, if neces-

sary, to a fresh deposit or a new project,” he

observes. “Another point is that one can start

small and slowly build up capacity in stages

by adding modules to the original installation.

Fixed plants simply don’t offer this type of

flexibility.”

He also notes that modular plants are well

suited to remote locations, as the plant modules

– which would normally have been tested prior

to dispatch – can be trucked to site in contain-

ers and assembled, Meccano-style, by a small

team of erectors with only minimal earthworks

and civils being necessary. “Compare this to

the situation with a fixed conventional plant,

where you will need to put in substantial pre-

paratory earthworks and civils and where the

workforce needed could well number hun-

dreds of people; specialist skills may need to be

sourced from neighboring countries given that

engineering and trade skills tend to be limited

in remote, undeveloped areas.”

DRA’s modular plants are frequently sup-

plied as part of a lump sum turnkey (LSTK)

package – which is where Hopwood, who

runs DRA’s Turnkey Projects Division, comes

in. “Frequently, clients want more than just a

plant – they want an entire turnkey package

that can assist them in making the transition

from a ‘greenfield’ site to commercial produc-

tion,” he explains. “Our LSTK business does

precisely this. We are even able to help with

project financing and – through sister company,

Minopex – with plant operation.”

As an example of this approach in action,

Hopwood points to a current contract that DRA

has with an emerging junior miner who has

secured the rights to an iron ore deposit north

of Brits. “We are supplying a package which

includes a 160 t/h processing module, as well

South Africa has a number of companies designing, manu-

facturing and supplying modular process plants, some of

themwith world-class reputations. Among them is Johan-

nesburg-based DRA, which has been supplying modular

plants to the minerals industry since being founded in the

1980s. Over the past couple of years, the group – which now

operates globally – has put a fresh focus on its modular

plant business, in the process reinvigorating its modular

plant range.

Modern Mining

recently spoke to DRA’s Grant

Westcott, GM – Modular Division, and Paul Hopwood, Man-

ager Turnkey Projects, to learn more about the benefits and

capabilities of DRA’s modular offering.

DRA

puts a fresh focus on its