Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  197 / 471 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 197 / 471 Next Page
Page Background

1

No negative feedback was provided by the collaborating laboratories in regards to the

2

performance of the 3M MDA

Listeria monocytogenes

.Several laboratories reported difficulty in

3

isolating and identifying

Listeria

colonies on Oxford agar (OXA) from samples enriched in the

4

DF broth base (without FAC) when compared to samples enriched in the AOAC OMA 991.12

5

selective enrichment broth. This may be related to differences in formulation between the two

6

enrichments. The AOAC OMA 993.12 enrichment broth is designed to reduce the background

7

flora on OXA and is more selective than DF broth base (without FAC). In some instances, this

8

level of selectivity may cause stress on

Listeria

cells thus requiring a longer enrichment time to

9

reach a detectable level.

10

Based on the data submitted, 2 laboratories were removed from statistical consideration for

11

both the full fat cottage cheese and the deli turkey. For the cottage cheese, laboratory 6 did not

12

follow the approved incubation time andtemperature conditions for the candidate method

13

(samples were incubated for 48 hours at 30

o

C and the validated enrichment time and temperature

14

are 24 to 28 hours at 37

o

C.) and laboratory 12 confirmed growth from all plates, regardless of

15

supplementary tests that would have precluded confirmation via API

Listeria.

Due to this fact, all

16

samples confirmed via API

Listeria

produced a

Listeria

species result even if Gram reaction

17

(Gram negative), motility reaction (negative), catalase reaction (negative)andoxidase reaction

18

(positive) would indicate the orgnaisms is not of the genus

Listeria

. For the deli turkey,

19

laboratory 8 incorrectly enriched half of their candidate method samples using the reference

20

method enrichment broth (UVM) instead of DF broth. Laboratory 10 reported more confirmed

21

positive results in their uninoculated control samples (for both the candidate and reference

22

method) then for their low level contamination level indicating a substantial level of laboratory

23

cross-contamination. Based on these results, these laboratories were removed from statistical

24

analysis. No laboratories were removed from statistical analysis based on discrepancies between

25

presumptive and confirmed results.

26

During the collaborative study evaluation 7 false positive (3 for full fat cottage cheese and 4

27

for deli turkey) and 8 false negative (4 for full fat cottage cheese and 4 for deli turkey) were

28

obtained out of 792 total test portions analyzed by the 3M MDA

Listeria monocytogenes

. The

29

candidate methodcorrectly identified whether a test portion was positive or negative more than

30

98.1% of the time (false positive rate of 0.9% and false negative rate of 1.0%). Several of the

31

false positive discrepant results were obtained from uninoculated control test portions and

32

several of the false negative discrepant results were obtained from high level inoculated test

33

portions which may indicate that they are the result of laboratory error and not performance of

34

the assay. No evidence of physical cause or suspicion of cause was noted and it was determined

35

that they would be included in the statistical analysis.

36

For each matrix, the collaborative study indicated that no statistically significant difference

37

between the candidate method and the reference methods or the presumptive and confirmed

38

results of the candidate method was obtained when using the POD statistical model.

39

40

41

Recommendations

42

43

It is recommended that the 3M Molecular Detection Assay

Listeria monocytogenes

method be

44

adopted as Official First Action status for the detection of

Listeria monocytogenes

in selected

45

foods includingbeef hot dogs (25 g & 125 g), deli turkey (25 g & 125 g), cold smoked salmon

46

(25 g), full fat cottage cheese (25 g), chocolate milk (25 g), and two environmental surfaces,

47

Candidates for 2016 Method of the Year

161