Previous Page  192 / 482 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 192 / 482 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

APRIL 1989

is deemed to be taken when a

person (the Transferee or

Donee) takes property under a

disposition otherwise than for

full consideration in money or

money's worth paid by him. In

arriving at the taxable value of

the gift, Section 18 (2) of the

Act allows a deduction for any

bona fide

consideration in

money or money's worth paid

by the Donee. Stamp Duty may

also be a good deduction if in

fact it was paid by the Donee.

In such a case the Stamp Duty

would be regarded as a liability

properly payable out of the gift

(Section 18 (1) of the Act).

Payment of the Stamp Duty by

the Donee would not be re-

garded as partial consideration

under Section 18 (2)(a) of the

Act because the Transferor is

not liable for the Stamp Duty

and therefore the Donee is not

taking over a liability of the

Transferor. The provisions of

the latter sub section would

apply to Capital Gains Tax paid

by the Donee, as this would be

a liability of the Transferor

taken over by the Donee. The

Donee is primarily accountable

for the Gift Tax. The Transferor

(Disponer) is also accountable.

3. Capital Gains Tax:

The transfer of an asset by way

of a gift is a disposal for Capital

Gains Tax purposes. Section 9

Capital Gains Tax Act 1975,

states that a person's disposal

of an asset shall, for the

purposes of the Act, be

deemed

to be for a

consideration equal to the

market value of the asset when

he disposes of the asset

otherwise than by way of a

bargain made at arm's length

(including in particular where

he disposes of it by way of

gift).

Under Paragraph 3 Schedule

1 Capital Gains Tax Act 1975,

sums allowable as a deduction

from the consideration in

computing Capital Gains Tax

include the incidental costs to

the transferor of the dispdsal of

the asset. These incidental

costs are stated specifically to

include Stamp Duty. If however

the Stamp Duty was already

deducted for Capital Acquisi-

tion purposes, on the basis that

it was paid by the Donee, then

it would not be a deduction for

Capital Gains Tax purposes as

it would not have been paid by

the Transferor.

It appears therefore that

Stamp Duty is a good de-

duction for either Capital Gains

Tax purposes or for Gift Tax

purposes, but not for both

taxes.

The Transferor is account-

able for the Capital Gains Tax

(Section 4 Capital Gains Tax

Act 1975). The tax is also

recoverable from the Donee if

the Transferor has not paid it

within twelve months from the

date when the tax became

payable. The Donee, however,

has a right to recover the tax

from the Transferor as a simple

contract debt (Paragraph 18

Schedule 4 Capital Gains Tax

Act 1975).

Section 63 Finance Act

1985, as amended by Section

66 Finance Act 1988, allows

Capital Gains Tax to be credited

against Capital Acquisitions

Tax. Where Gift Tax is charged

in respect of property on an

event happening on or after

30th January 1985 and the

same event constitutes a

disposal of that property for

Capital Gains Tax purposes,

Capital Gains Tax payable is not

deducted in ascertaining the

taxable value of the property

for Gift Tax purposes but,

insofar as it has been paid, it

shall be deducted from the net

Gift Tax as a credit against the

same; for example Mr. X makes

a gift of his farm to his cousin

and the Gift Tax payable

amounts to £10,000. Capital

Gains Tax of £4,000 is also

chargeable on the disposal.

The Gift Tax liability is reduced

by £4,000 to £6,000 so that

the total tax payable on the

disposition is £10,000, that is

Gift Tax £6,000 and Capital

Gains Tax £4,000.

In advising in a gift situation

the

relevant

legislation

regarding Stamp Duty, Capital

Acquisitions Tax and Capital

Gains Tax must be considered.

To enable a practitioner to

assess the fiscal liability of his

client in these areas much

more information is required

than would be necessary if the

Stamp Duty liability alone was

being considered.

The following check list may

be of assistance in enabling a

practitioner to obtain all the

essential information.

For example, in the case of A

purporting to transfer immov-

able property to B, the

following data would be

essential in order to advise on

the tax consequences of the

transaction.

(A) Regarding the Property

to be Transferred:

(i) It is essential to

ascertain the market value

of the property at the date

of the transfer for all three

taxes.

While it is generally

accepted that the same

market value should apply

for all cases, in practice it

does not always work out

that way. Market value is

essentially a matter for

agreement between the

parties involved and a third

party ought not to be bound

by

such

agreement.

Accordingly, if the Revenue

Commissioners agree a

market value for Gift Tax

purposes with the Donee,

this should not bind the

Transferor, who is account-

able for the Capital Gains

Tax, however much it may

inhibit the Revenue Com-

missioners in arguing

another value later for

Capital Gains Tax purposes.

In practice, at the initial

stage, the Revenue Com-

missioners value property

for Stamp Duty purposes

only, unless requested

otherwise by the taxpayer

and notify the taxpayer ac-

cordingly. Neither side is

therefore bound by that

valuation for the purposes

of Gift Tax or Capital Gains

Tax. This practice speeds up

the adjudication process

and is acceptable in

general. However, if a prac-

titioner wishes to agree a

market value for all three

taxes, he should inform the

Revenue Commissioners

and they will act according-

ly. It is understandable that

the Revenue Commis-

178