Previous Page  193 / 482 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 193 / 482 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

sioners are more likely to

agree a market value in res-

pect of a tax liability charge-

able maybe at 3% for Stamp

Duty purposes than in

respect of a Gift Tax or a

Capital Gains Tax liability,

which may be charged at a

rate of maybe 30%. No

problem should arise if a

practitioner makes it quite

clear to the Revenue Com-

missioners that he requires

a market value agreed for all

tax purposes.

It should be noted that

we are speaking here of the

open market value of im-

movable property. Different

considerations would apply

in the case of a transfer of

private company shares

where differing legislative

provisions might apply for

valuation purposes.

(ii) The market value of the

property when it was acquired

by A is necessary for Cap-

ital Gains Tax purposes. If

the property was acquired

prior to 6th April, 1974 the

market value at that latter

date is also necessary.

(iii) The question of whether

the property has develop-

ment value can be important.

This is particularly so for

Capital Gains Tax purposes,

where the rate of tax and

indexation may be affected.

It should be noted that de-

velopment value has no

relevance for Capital Ac-

quisitions Tax purposes in

the sense that lands that

have development value are

still agricultural property

and, as such, are entitled to

agricultural relief if applic-

able in the circumstances of

the particular case.

(iv) If the property to be

transferred includes a dwel-

ling house it may be exempt

from Capital Gains Tax

under Section 25 Capital

Gains Tax Act 1975 if it is

A's main residence. In such

a case an apportionment of

market value would be nec-

essary for Capital Gains Tax.

(B) Regarding the Transferor

(Disponer):

(i) The

consanguinity

between the Transferor and

the Transferee is very

relevant;

(a) The amount of Stamp

Duty chargeable may be

reduced by one-half if the

appropriate consanguinity

certificate is included in the

transfer. (See Paragraph 4

of the Head of Charge 'con-

veyance or transfer on sale'

in the First Schedule as

amended to the Stamp Act

1891).

In this connection a

common problem must be

high-lighted. Where, for

example, the Transferor

transfers property to his son

and to the son's wife, the

provisions of Paragraph 4

do not apply, as the son's

wife has no consanguinity

to the Transferor. This prob-

lem cannot be overcome by

two transfers, that is, one

from the Transferor to his

son of the entire property

followed by a transfer by

the son of that property into

the joint names of himself

and his wife because, in

that case, the overall duty

ASKUS

TRANSLATION

SERVICES

LTD.

TRANSLATORS

AND

INTERPRETERS

19 DUKE STREET, DUBLIN 2

Tel.: 779954/770795

Fax: 774183

APRIL 1989

payable would be the same.

However, if the family home

is involved, the second

transfer would be exempt to

that extent and therefore a

Stamp Duty saving might

be obtained. If two transfers

are used, the anti-avoidance

provisions of Section 8

Capital Acquisitions Tax Act

1976 should be kept in

mind.

(b) For Capital Acquisi-

tions Tax purposes the class

thresholds and the "favour-

ite nephew" relief are based

on consanguinity.

(c) For Capital Gains Tax

purposes the relief afforded

by Section 27 Capital Gains

Tax Act 1975, as amended

by Section 8 Capital Gains

(Amendment) Act 1978 is

confined to children, includ-

ing favourite nephews and

nieces of the Transferor.

(d) The provisions of the

Status of Children Act 1987

may be relevant (see

Sections 3 and 27 of that

Act).

(ii) The Age of the Trans-

feror: This is relevant for

Capital Gains Tax purposes.

The reliefs provided by

Section 26 Capital Gains

Tax Act 1975 and also

Section 27 as already men-

tioned apply only where the

Transferor is over 55 years

of age at the date of the

transfer.

(iii) How long hes the

Transferor owned the

Property? This is relevant

for Capital Gains Tax pur-

poses as the rate of tax and

indexation may be affected.

Furthermore, the reliefs

under Section 26 and 27 of

the Capital Gains Tax Act

already mentioned are not

available unless the qualify-

ing assets have been owned

by the Transferor for the

period of not less than 10

years ending with the date

of the disposal.

(iv) Does the Transferor

wish to reserve rights to

himself or to others? Such

a provision would affect

Stamp Duty and Gift Tax. A

deduction could be claimed

for Stamp Duty purposes

179