Previous Page  53 / 482 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 53 / 482 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

FEBRUARY 1989

this

Issue <

Viewpoint

39

Defective Building Work:

Who should pay?

41

From the President 45 Practice Notes 47

Younger Members News

48

Sources of European

Community Law:

Where to find them

Part 2 49 People and Places 54 Advice on Investments 57 For your Diary 61

Forensic Fable

61

Computerised Accounting

for Solicitors 63 Book Reviews 66

Professional Information

69

Cover Photo:

Alderman Alice Glenn,

Deputy Lord Mayor, with Gerard Griffin,

Solicitor President of the Dublin Sol

icitors Bar Association, and Daire Mur-

phy, Secretary, D.S.B.A., at the D.S.B.A.

Meeting of 2 December, 1988, which was

held in the Dicing Room of the Mansion

House, in honour of the Dublin Millennium.

Executive Editor:

Mary Gaynor

Committee:

Geraldine Clarke, Chairman

Eamonn G. Hall.

Vice

-Chairman

John F. Buckley

Gary Byrne

Patrick McMahon

Timothy Dalton

Charles R. M. Meredith

Daire Murphy

John Schutte

Advertising:

Seán Ó hOisín. Telephone: 305236

307860

Printing:

Turner's Printing Co. Ltd., Longford.

- *

The views expressed in this publication,

save where otherwise indicated, are the

views of the contributors and not

necessarily the views of the Council of

the Society.

The appearance of an advertisement in

this publication does not necessarily

indicate approval by the Society for the

product or service advertised.

Published at Blackhall Place, Dublin 7.

Tel.: 7 1 0 7 11

Telex: 31219.

Fax: 7 1 0 7 0 4.

GAZETTE

Viewpoint

The sudden announcement of the

immediate withdrawal by the

Revenue Commissioners of the

facilities for stamping documents

by post exemplifies the typical

failures of our public service,

creating despair in those who had

hoped for real improvement. A

major revenue area has been

allowed to become so under-staffed

that a back-log of cases (extending

to 8 weeks by the Revenue's own

admission) has built up. At the very

least this must lead to a significant

loss of interest on the stamp duty

payable to the State.

No attempt was made to consult

with the Law Society or any other

professional group whose members

are presumably responsible for the

vast majority of documents present-

ed for stamping. It is not incon-

ceiveable that some less drastic

solution to the problem might have

emerged from such consultation,

other minds might possibly have

been able to suggest a solution

which had escaped the Revenue.

The Revenue, like other Depart-

ments apparently oblivious to the

fact that people would have made

arrangements based on existing

practices, introduced the change

virtually without notice. Would 9

weeks back-log have been much

more disasterous than 8? Aweek's

delay could have allowed alter-

native arrangements to be made

for urgent cases.

In its advertisement drawing

attention to the difficulties caused

by the withdrawal of the postal

facilities for stamping documents,

the Law Society drew attention to

another department of the public

service, tne Land Registry, where

the service available to the public

has become quite unacceptable.

Again it appears that the public

service embargo is the principal

culprit. While it is appreciated that

a policy of reducing the numbers of

public servants must be applied

rigorously, if exceptions are not to

become the norm, there is a strong

argument for treating quasi com-

mercial areas of activity, such as

the Land Registry, differently.

Reductions in staff numbers

should only take place where an

institution, which should be self

financing, can be seen to perform

efficiently with a smaller staff. It

would seem that the increase in the

back-log of cases — transfers of

part (and probably the majority of

these sales of house sites) now

take over a year to complete — has

built up not only at a time of the

operation of the embargo but also

as the Land Registry's surplus on

its activities declines.

This is quite simply crazy. People

are prepared to pay for a service

from the Land Registry. The Reg-

istry itself has done its best to

modernise its operations under

severe financial restrictions. It

should be permitted to engage

sufficient staff to provide a decent

service.

Some 25 years ago the Regis-

tration of Title Act was part of a

package of law reform measures

introduced under the aegis of the

present Taoiseach when Minister

for Justice. One of its aims was the

extension of the Land Registration

system to the entire country.

Twenty-five years later the original

three counties in which compul-

sory registration was introduced

remain the only counties in which

compulsory registration can be

achieved. Perhaps the Taoiseach

should take some steps to ensure

that the expansion which he

desired is capable of achievement.

The Law Society recently pro-

posed to the Government that the

Land Registry should be converted

into a public corporation on the

lines of An Bord Telecom, with a

view to giving it independence and

enabling it to operate on a more

commercial basis. Much has been

spoken of the need to improve our

physical infra-structure to enable

us to compete in the Europe of the

1990s. It is equally important that

our administrative infra-structure is

able to perform efficiently.

39