Previous Page  29 / 482 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 29 / 482 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JANUARY 1989

much less likely to be effective than

to speak from notes: the lawyer

appearing before the European

Court is still there as an advocate

and a few strong submissions will

catch the attention of the Court,

attract the waiverers, and maybe

shake those who have already

formed their preliminary view to the

contrary on the basis of the written

pleadings. This remains true even

if many Members of the Court are

listening in translation so that they

may only receive what is said

seconds or minutes after it has

been said by the advocate. The

interpretation is of very high quality.

Short sentences, clear language

and a moderated speed are,

however, vital, not for the

convenience of thé interpreters, but

for the communication and

understanding of the arguments in

the case. English lawyers have the

advantage that most Members of

the Court understand English —an

advantage not enjoyed by the

Greek, Danish or Portuguese

advocate — and they can risk

idioms, even the occasional

humorous remark, so long as they

bear in mind that idioms and jokes

do not always translate easily.

This does not mean that counsel

must drop down to the slowest

possibly speed of speaking — even

if they know that they are being

interpreted into other languages. To

my mind, what is predominantly

important — and few advocates

seem to have realised this — is to

pause between sentences so that

the interpreter can catch up. A

sentence at normal court speed

with a pause is more effective than

a slow drawl without a break. Stick

to the time limits, emphasise,

develop or amend those arguments

which have been set out in the

report for the hearing, hammer

home any point which may not

have appeared fully enough in the

report for the hearing.

British counsel have established

a high reputation as advocates —

not just with those of us who are

anglophone, but generally — and

their court experience gives them

a strong lead over others who lack

such experience

in

other

jurisdictions. They can have a major

effect on the decision by their

presence at the oral hearing — and

it must not be forgotten that the

judges are human, so that the old

saying "the higher the court the

better the jury point" has some

force so long as the argument does

not become over-histrionic or

emotional.

Where I think English counsel

have really triumphed is in question

time. They are used to being

interrupted and can cope with

questions even during their

speeches. This does not happen

frequently before the full Court

since if one Member begins the

others may follow and the hearing

becomes disorganised — it does,

however increasingly happen

before a chamber of three judges.

Questions used to be asked after

the speeches in reply; now more

commonly they are asked after the

first round of speeches so that the

second speech can be shorter if

indeed it is necessary at all.

Answering questions crisply and

firmly can do much to win a case

— all too often lawyers go back to

their text or seem incapable of

dealing with the question, largely

because they are apparently not

used to the process.

For this purpose it is important,

and by no means always done, for

counsel to have immediately at

hand the exhibits for the case and

more particularly the relevant

legislation. All too often some

lawyers do not seem to be able to

turn up quickly the relevant

document when asked a question,

all they have is their typed speech.

The English lawyer's training and

experience again stand him in good

stead in this kind of situation.

Saving time at the moment is

regarded as of great importance. It

is for example quite enough to

begin with "My Lords"; a shorter

formula than that adopted and

interspersed frequently by many

Continental lawyers in their speeches

"Monsieur le Président, Messieurs

les juges, Monsieur l'avocat général",

which seems to me always

inordinately time wasting. And

when counsel have said what they

really have to say it is better to stop,

to field questions and, if necessary,

to come back in reply.

GAZETTE BINDERS

Price £5.14 (incl. VAT)

+ 87p postage

FOR YOUR DIARY . . .

17 February, 1989

Solicitors Apprentices Rugby Club.

Match v. English Law Society.

2.30pm. U.C.D., Belfield. (Beside

Sports Centre.)

17 February, 1989

Continuing Legal Education Seminar.

Company Law.

Consultants: Paul J. G.

Egan, Solicitor and Michael G. Irvine

Solicitor. Blackhall Place, Dublin'

9.30am - 5.30pm.

23 February, 1989

Medico-Legal Society of Ireland.

The

pros and cons of screening for women

Speaker: Dr. Peter Skrabanek, Dept. of

Community Health, Trinity College,

Dublin. 8.30pm. United Service Club,

St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2.

23 February, 1989

Continuing Legal Education Seminar.

The Legal Receptionist,

(for Reception-

ists). Metropole Hotel, Cork. 9.30am -

1.00pm.

23 February, 1989

Continuing Legal Education Seminar.

The Legal Secretary,

(for Secretaries).

Metropole Hotel, Cork. 2.30pm - 5.30pm.

23 Febraury 1989

Continuing Legal Education Seminar.

Co-Ops.

Consultant: Eugene McCagne,

Solicitor. Metropole Hotel, Cork. 7 30 -

9.30pm.

24 February, 1989

Continuing Legal Education Seminar.

Company Law.

Consultants: Paul J. G.

Egan, Solicitor, and Michael G. Irvine,

Solicitor. Metropole Hotel, Cork.

9.30am - 5.30pm.

2 March, 1989

Continuing Legal Education Seminar.

Land Registry Practice.

Consultants:

Barry Lysaught, Solicitor, and Moling

Ryan, B.L., Land Registry.

10 March, 1989

Insolvency Practitioners Association

(Irish Branch) / Law Society. Meeting

at Milltown Golf Club. Speakers: John

Glackin, Solicitor, Frank Sowman,

Solicitor, Ray Jackson (IPA) and Tom

Grace (IPA). 6.00pm - 10.00pm.

Members wishing to attend should

contact Eileen McCormac at the Law

Society. 710711.

30 March, 1989

Medico-Legal Society of Ireland.

DNA

Profiles - the identikit of the Future.

Speaker: Dr. Maureen Smyth, Ph.D.,

Forensic Scientist, Department of

Justice. 8.30pm. United Services Club,

St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2.

4-7 May, 1989

Law Society Annual Conference. Hotel

Europe, Killarney, Kerry.

Further details on

CLE Seminars

may

be had by consulting the CLE Brochure

circulated with the November

Gazette,

or by contacting Geraldine Pearse at

710711.

15