Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  127 / 264 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 127 / 264 Next Page
Page Background

disease.

9

In the current review, we will use recidivism as

a complete term for both residual and recurrent dis-

ease.

10

We aim to identify which cholesteatoma removal

technique, CWU or CWD surgery, results in the lowest

rate of cholesteatoma recidivism in adult patients with a

primary acquired cholesteatoma. We expect the CWD

technique to have a lower cholesteatoma recidivism risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Search Strategy

We conducted a search in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane

and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature

(CINAHL) databases on December 10th, 2014. Our search syntax

is provided in the Appendix (available online only). Both title/

abstract and full-text screening were based on predefined inclu-

sion and exclusion criteria and performed by a combination of at

least two authors (combination of K.G.P.K., M.B.J.K., T.H.L.

V

S.,

S.J.A.V.) (Fig. 1). Studies that compared residual and recurrent

risks of both cholesteatoma removal techniques (CWU and CWD)

in adult patients with primary cholesteatoma were selected. We

excluded studies applying partly performed CWU techniques.

11

We reviewed references of included articles and used Scopus and

Web of Science to apply a cross-reference check.

Quality Assessment

We constructed a critical appraisal tool (CAT) to verify the

relevance and validity of included studies (Table I). A minimal

of two authors (combination of K.G.P.K., M.B.J.K., S.J.A.V.,

T.H.L.

V

S.) appraised included studies. Relevance of determinant

(CWU or CWD) was not assessed because all studies with an

undefined determinant were excluded at the initial screening

(title/abstract and full-text screening). We considered the follow-

ing factors important during CAT screening: 1) definition of

patients’ age, 2) reported length of follow-up and 3) distinction

between residual and recurrent disease. Firstly, definition of

age was important because the incidence of disease recidivism

Fig. 1. Flowchart for study selection. Literature search performed on the 10th of December, 2014.

After removal of duplicates, screening on title and abstract using the inclusion and exclusion criteria, screening on full-text and study

assessment, 8 articles remained for critical appraisal.

Legend: CINAHL

5

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; C(S)OM

5

chronic (suppurative) otitis media, CWD

5

canal

wall down, CWU

5

canal wall up.

*All inclusions and exclusions were made by consensus of at least two authors.

Laryngoscope 126: April 2016

Kerckhoffs et al.: A Review on Cholesteatoma Recidivism After CWU and CWD

106