Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  208 / 264 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 208 / 264 Next Page
Page Background

nerve outcome (HB I-II) between study and control sub-

jects (Table V).

DISCUSSION

We present a large multicenter case-control study

comparing outcomes between postradiated sporadic VS

and nonradiated control subjects. Among 37 sporadic

VSs that failed primary SRS, our data demonstrate that

approximately 77% of patients with normal preoperative

facial nerve function retained good (HB I or II) function

after salvage surgery, and GTR can be achieved in at

least half of the cases. Overall, the rate of long-term

facial nerve paresis was similar to a size-matched con-

trol population of primary VS; however, the rate of less-

than-complete resection was significantly higher in the

postradiation group.

In 2005, Friedman et al. similarly reviewed a series

of 38 patients (28 sporadic, 10 NF2) who received sal-

vage microsurgery following failed primary radiation

therapy compared to a historical nonradiated control

group matched according to age and tumor size.

7

Similar

to the current study, they found that the rate of gross

total resection was lower in the irradiated group (78.9%

vs. 97.4%); however, in contrast they found that facial

nerve outcomes were poorer than age- and size-matched

nonradiated controls (37% vs. 70% HB I or II). The latter

discrepancy may be partly explained by several differen-

ces between study populations. In our study, the major-

ity of patients (95%) underwent Gamma Knife (Elekta

Instruments AB) radiosurgery after the year 2000 using

current low-dose treatment parameters. In contrast, the

study from the House Ear Clinic spanned the years

between 1985 and 2004 and included heterogeneous

radiation delivery: gamma knife, linear accelerator

(LINAC), and proton beam. Their median length of

follow-up was 15 months compared to 26 months.

Finally, 10 of the 38 patients had NF2. Patients with

NF2-associated VS are known to have poorer postopera-

tive facial nerve outcomes compared to patients with

sporadic VS.

15

In 2011, Friedman et al. reported an

updated institutional experience, including 17 NF2

patients and 56 sporadic VSs, advocating for partial or

near-total resection when required in order to preserve

facial nerve integrity.

6

In this updated series, 79.5%

received GTR and 20.5% received partial resection. Over-

all, 65% of patients had postoperative HB grade I or II

function; 57% following gross total resection compared to

92% following partial resection. Anatomical continuity of

the facial nerve was lost in 10 (13.7%) cases. A control

group was not included in this latter analysis.

In 2012, Gerganov et al. also found a much higher

rate of poor facial nerve function (43% HB gr 3–6) after

salvage surgery in patients who had prior radiation com-

pared to nonradiated controls (30% HB gr 3–6). Gross

total resection was performed in all but one control

case.

9

In 2013, Husseini et al. compared surgical out-

comes of 15 patients who had prior radiation therapy

(13 sporadic, 2 NF2) to a control group consisting of 15

nonradiated VSs matched according to age, tumor size,

and surgical approach.

8

Overall, 13 (87%) previously

irradiated VSs were managed with gross total resection.

The facial nerve was anatomically preserved in 14 of 15

cases, but only four of 13 (31%) patients who had HB

grade I or II function preoperatively maintained HB I or

II function following salvage surgery. None of the

patients in any of these series experienced recurrence

following salvage surgery, regardless of extent of

TABLE V.

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis Investigating

Independent Associations With Good Postoperative

Facial Nerve Outcome (HB I-II).

Variable

Odds Ratio (95% CI)

P

Value

Study vs. control subjects

0.61 (0.18–2.04)

0.424

Presurgical tumor size

0.69 (0.33–1.45)

0.332

Age

0.94 (0.87–1.01)

0.079

Extent of resection

GTR vs. STR

0.18 (0.02–1.37)

0.097

Extent of resection

NTR vs. STR

0.67 (0.07–6.67)

0.730

Length of follow-up after

salvage

0.92 (0.74–1.14)

0.436

CI

5

confidence interval; GTR

5

gross total resection; HB

5

House-

Brackmann; NTR

5

near total resection; STR

5

subtotal resection.

Fig. 2. Comparison of facial nerve out-

comes between study and control subjects

by extent of resection

Wise et al.: Surgical Salvage for Recurrent VS

187