Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  206 / 264 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 206 / 264 Next Page
Page Background

patients developed hydrocephalus. Of these, two (5%)

patients were treated with placement of a ventriculoperi-

toneal shunt. Two patients had delayed onset facial pare-

sis greater than 4 months following SRS, with HB scores

of II and III, respectively. Of the 17 patients who had serv-

iceable hearing (class A and B) prior to treatment, 15 lost

useful hearing, and only one retained class A hearing after

SRS at a median follow-up of 40 months after treatment.

Characteristics of Recurrent Vestibular

Schwannoma

Primary treatment failure was defined as tumor

growth after initial treatment with or without new

symptoms (37, 97%), or development of refractory symp-

toms related to mass effect necessitating intervention (1,

3%). Thirty-six of 38 (95%) subjects had two or more

post-SRS imaging studies available for review, and the

median number of MRI studies per case was four (range

1–9). Two patients had only one MRI scan following pri-

mary SRS. In both cases, the degree of tumor growth led

to a decision to treat with salvage surgery rather than

continue observation. One of these subjects had a tumor

that doubled in greatest linear dimension (0.6–1.2 cm)

over 2 years. The second subject had 0.8 cm of tumor

growth over a 2.8-year interval. Only one patient had

salvage surgery for a nongrowing tumor. This patient

TABLE I.

Description of Primary Radiation Therapy.

Radiation Modality

Parameters

Median (Range)

Complications

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery*

(n

5

35)

Marginal dose 12 Gy (12–14 Gy)

Maximal dose 26 Gy (24–40 Gy)

Number of isocenters 8 (4–60)

Volume treated 3.4 cm

3

(0.34–17 cm

3

)

2 late onset facial weakness

17 loss of useful hearing (class D)

3 hydrocephalus

Fractionated stereotactic

radiosurgery (n

5

2)

CyberKnife 18 Gy, 3 fractions (n

5

1)

20 Gy, 4 fractions (n

5

1)

0

*Elekta Instruments AB, Stockholm, Sweden.

Gy

5

gray.

TABLE II.

Comparison of Preoperative Baseline Patient Features: Cohort Composed of Previously Irradiated VS

and Control Subjects Composed of Previously Untreated VS.

Feature

Study Cohort

(n

5

37)

Matched Controls

(n

5

37)

P

Value

Female gender (n, %)

19 (51%)

21 (57%)

0.8

Age (yrs) Median (range)

61 (31–84)

60 (31–72)

0.7

HB Score (n, %)

I (35, 95%)

II (1, 3%)

III(1, 3%)

I (37, 100%)

0.3

Hearing class (n, %)

A (1, 3%)

B (0, 0%)

C (1, 3%)

D (33, 89%)

A 7 (19%)

B 8 (22%)

C 2 (5%)

D 19 (51%)

0.001*

Tumor size (cm) Median (range)

2.0 (0.56–4.12)

1.9 (0.5–4.5)

0.4

Tumor laterality, right-sided (n, %)

24 (65%)

27 (73%)

0.6

Intracanalicular (n, %)

0

1 (3%)

1.0

Cystic (n, %)

7 (19%)

9 (24%)

0.8

Brainstem edema (n, %)

2 (5%)

2 (5%)

1.0

Brainstem compression (n, %)

14 (38%)

18 (49%)

0.5

Hydrocephalus (n, %)

1 (3%)

2 (5%)

1.0

Trigeminal dysfunction (n, %)

6 (16%)

9 (24%)

0.6

Intermittent facial spasm (n, %)

3 (8%)

0

0.2

Imbalance (n, %)

10 (27%)

13 (35%)

0.6

Headache (n, %)

1 (3%)

0

1.0

RT, radiation therapy; HB Score

5

House-Brackmann Score.

Wise et al.: Surgical Salvage for Recurrent VS

185