Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  248 / 822 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 248 / 822 Next Page
Page Background

IV

session - 1890 - Calcutta

President: Pherozeshah Mehta

The chief feature of this session was

that the government publicly declared the

INC to be

"perfectly legitimate”

and al-

lowed public servants to attend it.

As a consequence of the efforts of Charles

Bradlaugh the British Parliament passed

the

Indian Councils Act of 1892;

though

disappointing the Congress hailed it as the

first victory of the constitutional agitation

started by it.

"Henceforth the Congress did never

falter in its onward march from year to

year, buoyed up with courage and hope

for ultimate success. Though there was

no essential change either in its ideal

and outlook, or in its method of agita-

tion, it came to be gradually recognized

both by friends and foes, in India and in

Britain, to be a potent force in the public

life of India."

V

session - 1891 - Nagpur

President: P. Anand Charlu

During this session among other things, a

resolution about the economic conditions of

the people was passed, which reads:

"That this Congress concurring in the view

set forth in previous Congresses, affirms -

That fully fifty millions of the population,

a number yearly increasing, are dragging out

a miserable existence on the verge of starva-

tion, and that, in every decade, several mil-

lions actually perish of starvation.

That this unhappy condition of affairs is

largely due to -

IX - session - 1893 - Lahore

President: Dadabhai Naoroji.

The Congress passed the resolution point-

ing out that

'material alterations are neces-

sary alike in the rules of the Government of

India and in the practice of most of the local

governments, if real effect is to be given to the

spirit of the Act.'

In 1904, the Congress went one step fur-

ther and demanded representation of Indians

in the British House of Commons. It also

asked for

"the appointment of Indian repre-

sentatives (who shall be nominated by the

elected members of the Legislative Councils)

as members of the Indian Council in Lon-

don...."

The Congress year after year passed reso-

lutions protesting the abuses and urging for

reforms in all spheres of administration; simi-

larly trial by jury, police reforms, tax reduc-

tion etc., comprised the contents of many

resolutions.

In 1898 the Congress expressed

"its deep

sense of disapproval of the reactionary policy

of Government with regard to the local self-

government, recently inaugurated by the in-

troduction of the Calcutta Municipal Bill into

the Bengal Legislative Council, the creation

of the Bombay City Improvement Trust with-

out adequate popular representation, and its

action in other directions."

At the 1901 Congress the Chairman of the

reception committee made a statement on the

'development of Indian industries.'

It reads as:

"We cannot live in ignorance of the su-

preme importance which industry has assumed

in modern civilisation. In these days every

Eternal India

encyclopedia

FREEDOM MOVEMENT

him the name

'Member of India'

in the House

of Commons.

A scheme of representative government

was drafted in this session; the Congress

also resolved to send a deputation to Eng-

land to express its views on political re-

forms in India.

The fifth session took a significant de-

parture from earlier sessions; the policy of

appealing to people to follow the path of the

Congress was abandoned and Hume's pro-

posal of

"to approach the great English nation

to do justice to India ”

was pursued; the Indian

National Congress henceforth adopted the

sacred creed :

"appeals to unselfishness, to jus-

tice and to humanity will ever find a sure

response from the great heart of the British

people."

*

The exclusion of the people of India from

a due participation in the administration.

*

The extravagant cost of the present ad-

ministration.

*

A short-sighted system of Land

Revenue Administration.

That hence it has become imperatively

necessary-

That the cost of the administration be

greatly reduced; and, in the Civil Branch, by

the wide substitution of a cheaper indige-

nous agency for the extremely costly im-

ported staff..."

The above resolution is an indication of

representation of popular feelings by the

INC and it also reveals the fact that its

criticisms were constructive in a way to

reveal the greatest evil of British admini-

stration.

political question is at bottom an economic

one. It seems that henceforward markets are

to be the battle-fields where destinies of na-

tions will be decided. With the average Euro-

pean, it is a fixed idea that in the pre-estab-

lished harmony of the universe, Europe is to

sell and Asia to buy. But we cannot help

feeling that our thoughts and energies cannot

be better employed than in the work of effect-

ing a revival and development of our indus-

tries. "

XVIII - session

1902 - Ahmedabad

President: Surendranath Banerji.

The President of the session put forward

the demand for protection of Indian industries

which reads thus:

"Our infant industries need protection.

But the Government wedded to the tradi-

tions of free trade, will not grant them pro-

tection. If, however, protection by legisla-

tive enactment is impossible, may we not,

by the fiat of national will, afford them such

protection as may lie in our power if we

resolve in our heart of hearts to avail

overselves, wherever practicable, of in-

digenous articles in preference to foreign

goods.... Our industrial helplessness is

even more deplorable than our political im-

potency.... Let it never be forgotten that po-

litical rights minister to material progress

and that an unenfranchised people can

never work out their industrial salvation."

The Preisdential speech of Surendra Nath

Banerjee; speaking on New Imperialism, he

said:

"Imperialism has always been syn-

onymous with autocracy. In ancient

Rome, as in modern France, imperial-

ism meant the supersession of popu-

lar authority and the establishment of

one-man authority

........

British imperi-

alism implies the closer union-the

more intimate federation between the

English-speaking

subjects

of

His

Majesty. We stand outside the pale

of this federation. We are not permit-

ted to enter the threshold of the Holy

of Holies. We are privileged only to

serve and to admire from a dis-

tance.... "

About "Our

Heritage"

he said,

"The

triumphs of liberty are not won in a day.

Liberty is a jealous goddess, exacting in her

worship and claiming from her votaries