Ancient Concepts, Sciences & Systems
encyclopedia
Maurya. This is a work of great interest and value. In the preamble
to the
Arthashastra,
the author has stated that it is being written as
a compendium of almost all th
t Arthashastras
composed till then by
ancient authors, and undoubtedly Chanakya has made it an encyclo-
paedia of statecraft and legal system for the guidance of all
concerned. Surprisingly this great work remained untraced, but for-
tunately it was unearthed by Dr. R. Shama Shastry of the Oriental
Research Institute, Mysore. He translated this great work and
published it in 1915. Chandragupta Maurya became the king in 322
B.C. and his son Bindusara ascended the throne in 298 B.C. It is
during this period that Chanakya lived and wrote this famous work,
sometime between 322 and 300 B.C. It is necessary to set out the
contents of the fifteen parts or books of his
Arthashastra
to give an
idea at a glance about the extent of the subject matter covered by
Kautilya on various topics relating to law and other affairs of State.
1.
Education, training and discipline to be imparted to a king to
equip him to discharge his onerous responsibilities ably and
efficiently, such as appointment of ministers and other offi-
cers of the State and other matters relating to its administra-
tion.
2.
Duties of various executive officers of the State.
3.
Law and its administration.
4.
Suppression of crime.
5.
Miscellaneous matters - such as steps to be taken in emer-
gencies, pay scales for state officers, duty of Chief Minister
of ensuring continuity of rule on the demise of king, etc.
6.
Seven constituents of State -
Rajamandala -
for discussion
of State’s relations with neighbours.
7.
Foreign policy — deals with the six political expedients in
the field of diplomacy.
8.
Methods to overcome various calamities to the State.
9.
Military Code - kinds of troops to be mobilised for an expe-
dition and proper seasons for the expedition and precautions
to be taken.
10.
Fighting methodology - at war.
11.
Steps to be taken by a would be conqueror.
12.
Design to be adopted by a weaker king when threatened by a
stronger king.
13.
Conquest of the enemy by various methods.
14.
Remedies and plans to be adopted in getting rid of enemies
or traitors.
15.
Object of and purpose achieved by
Arthashastra. —
defines
and illustrates practical training in 32 methods pertaining to
politics.
For more details on
Arthashastra
Refer K-34
Vincent Smith has pointed out that civil and constitutional laws
explained in the work are strikingly similar to those recorded by
Megasthenes and other. Greek writers.
THE TWO EPICS
The two great epics of this country,
The Ramayana
and
The
Mahabharatha,
constitute the treasure house and source of au-
thoritative exposition on several topics of law, particularly the latter
epic. The authors of these two works, Valmiki and Vyasa, sages
and authors of outstanding merit, have incorporated the most
important principles of Dharma accepted and prevailing in society,
in their respective ages in the context in which they became rele-
vant while narrating the stories. Consequently later authors of
Dharmashastras
have relied on the epics as authoritative sources
on general topics of law. For instance as regards the right of the
eldest son to succeed to his father’s kingdom, the
Ramayana
is
quoted as an authority in the work
Rajaniti Ratnakara
of Chan-
deswara. There are as many as 66 verses in the
Ramayana
which
pertain to the governance of the country (
Rajadharma
) in which the
duties and responsibilities of kings are set out.
Commentaries and digests : The commentators can aptly be
described as the architects of the Hindu legal system. By their
scintillating intellectual calibre and the force of logic and expres-
sion, they removed the angularities in the old hard, rock-like provi-
sions with the aid of accepted usages and customs and gave them
the required shape so as to fulfil the aspiration of the people during
the relevant period. The commentators amplified the narrow provi-
sions of the Smritis.
However this type of development of law could not be uniform,
obviously on account of the vastness of the country, existence of
several princely states and lack of easy and speedy communica-
tions. Therefore the commentators made their contribution to the
development of law in the particular region where they flourished
having due regard to the usage and custom followed by the society
in that region. Consequently the commentaries written in any
particular society and accepted by the society became the law for
that locality. In spite of these handicaps, only two broad divisions
of law developed on the basis of the two main commentaries,
though several sub-divisions with minor variations also came into
existence in certain regions. The two main divisions were 1.
Mitakshara
system, propounded by Vijnaneswara and 2.
Day-
abhaga
system, propounded by Jimuthavahana.
M I T A K S H A R A
The title Mitakshara which etymologically means ‘limited let-
ters’ is given to the celebrated commentary on the
Yajnavalkya
smriti
by Vijnaneswara to indicate that it is a brief and precise
commentary. The author of Mitakshara hailed from south India and
lived in the 11th century. He was an ascetic and wrote this
commentary during the reign of Vikramaditya whose capital city
was Kalyana. An inscription of 1124 A.D. found on the wall of a
Shiva temple at Martur in Gulbarga district reveals that King
Vikramaditya granted lands to Vijnaneswara in recognition of his
meritorious commentary. It deals with almost all the important
topics of law and synthesises the several
smriti
texts. It was soon
accepted as the paramount authority throughout the country except
in Bengal where for historical reasons not precisely known the
Dayabhagha system propounded by Jimutavahana was accepted.
Even at present in respect of matters not altered by legislation, it
continues to be the personal law applicable to the vast majority of
Hindus and is being enforced in the courts of law as it constitutes
the “existing law” saved by Article 372 of the Constitution.
D A Y A B HA GA
Dayabhaga of Jimuthavahana : This is a dissertation on the law
of inheritance and partition. This work is not in the nature of a com-
mentary but is a digest of all the
smritis.
Jimutavahana, who is the
founder of this system, appears to have flourished in the early part
Eternal India