Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  37 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 37 / 64 Next Page
Page Background www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au

JCPSLP

Volume 19, Number 2 2017

91

Set up a clear contract at the start outlining the

purposes of this supervision, management of

confidentiality, recordkeeping etc.

Find a supervisor with whom you can develop an open,

warm, trusting, supportive relationship, with whom you

can collaborate in your own ongoing development.

Jointly set the agenda for each meeting. Come prepared

for supervision in order to make maximal use of this

thinking space.

Ensure there is a focus on relationships and reflection

in a safe, respectful space where you can discuss your

responses to the work, your relationships and dynamics

at work, your experience of your own skill development,

your emotional support requirements as well as

organisational governance requirements.

Access SPA’s resources and templates to support you.

Acknowledgements

This article arises from a literature review originally funded

by Health Workforce Australia (HWA) as part of a Clinical

Supervision Fellowship Project.

References

Bakas, T., McLennon, S. M., Carpenter, J. S., Buelow, J.

M., Otte, J. L., Hanna, K. M., ... & Welch, J. L. (2012).

Systematic review of health-related quality of life models.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

,

10

(1), 134–146.

Borrell-Carrió, F., Suchman, A., & Epstein, R. (2004). The

biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice,

and scientific inquiry.

Annals of Family Medicine

,

2

(6),

576–82. doi: 10.1370/afm.245.

Bowles, N., & Young, C. (1999). An evaluative study

of clinical supervision based on Proctor’s three function

interactive model.

Journal of Advanced Nursing

,

30

(4),

958–964.

Butterworth, T., Bell, L., Jackson, C., & Pajnkihar, M.

(2008). Wicked spell or magic bullet? A review of the clinical

supervision literature 2001–2007.

Nurse Education Today

,

28

(3), 264–272.

Crettenden, I. F., McCarty, M. V., Fenech, B. J.,

Heywood, T., Taitz, M. C., & Tudman, S. (2014). How

evidence-based workforce planning in Australia is informing

policy development in the retention and distribution of the

health workforce.

Human Resources for Health

,

12

(1), 7.

Dawson, M., Phillips, B., & Leggat, S. (2013). Clinical

supervision for allied health professionals: A systematic

review.

Journal of Allied Health

,

42

(2), 65–73.

Eagar, K. (2011). What is activity-based funding? ABF

Information Series No. 1.

HIM Interchange

,

1

(1), 22–23.

Retrieved from

http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?art

icle=1049&context=gsbpapers

Fitzpatrick, S., Smith, M., & Wilding, C. (2012). Quality

allied health clinical supervision policy in Australia: a

literature review.

Australian Health Review

,

36

(4), 461–465.

Fowler, J., & Chevannes, M., (1998). Evaluating the

efficacy of reflective practice within the context of clinical

supervision.

Journal of Advanced Nursing

,

27

, 379–382.

Geller, E. (2002). A reflective model of supervision in

speech-language pathology.

The Clinical Supervisor

,

20

(2),

191–200.

Geller, E., & Foley, G. M. (2009). Expanding the “ports of

entry” for speech-language pathologists: A relational and

reflective model for clinical practice.

American Journal of

Speech-Language Pathology

,

18

, 4–21.

Health Workforce Australia (HWA). (2013).

National

clinical supervision competency resource

. Adelaide: Author.

Why is supervision important for

practising SLPs?

The importance of supervision for SLPs has been

recognised by SPA in three recent publications, a position

statement on the Role and Value of Professional Support

(SPA, 2014b), Supervision Standards (SPA, 2014a) and

Supervision and Clinical Support Definitions and Templates

(SPA, 2016). SPA “recognises the importance for all

practising speech-language pathologists to access

professional and discipline specific supervision throughout

their careers” (SPA, 2014b, p. 6), with intense support

required for the first two years (SPA, 2014b). Supervision:

supports and facilitates the development of clinical

reasoning and reflective practice skills of supervisees;

ensures the knowledge, skills and attitudes of

supervisees are being discussed and developed

(this includes the sophisticated communication and

relationship skills required for current practice); and

ensures the supervisee is engaged with the organisation

and practising in a competent, accountable way,

meeting their position requirements (SPA, 2014a).

SPA describes six standards for supervision and

their related indicators: ethical responsibilities; required

documentation; training and experience; the focus of

supervision; the relationship; and dealing with misconduct

(SPA, 2014a).

Summary and conclusions

In the changing health landscape the workforce is faced

with significant challenges. Supervision can be an important

tool to mitigate these challenges, improve client outcomes,

and support SLPs to develop their knowledge,

communication and relationship skills, while reducing levels

of stress and burnout. Supervision needs to occur regularly

with a clear commitment, purpose, contract and ongoing

recordkeeping. A supportive and stable organisational

context forms the basis for effective supervision, with an

organisationally endorsed, individually tailored approach to

supervision, and access to resources and training. Effective

supervision is based on a warm, trusting, supportive,

collaborative relationship between the supervisor and

supervisee, creating a safe, respectful space that actively

encourages reflection for learning. A model which

emphasises relational and reflective aspects, such as that

presented by Geller and Foley (2009) is recommended for

SLPs, with the functions of supervision being described by

Proctor’s model (Kilminster & Jolly, 2000).

Overall, the evidence base for effective supervision is

limited but growing across disciplines. More research is

required in SLP, particularly around the implementation and

effectiveness of models such as Geller and Foley’s (2009) in

different organisations. A review of supervision for students to

identify gaps and future recommendations is also warranted.

Key points for SLPs in the

implementation of supervision

Support for supervision from your organisation is crucial

– does your organisation have a policy to support

supervision? Will your organisation support the time

required for supervision? Is there support for training in

this area?

Ensure you and your supervisor can commit to ongoing

regular meetings – when, where, how often? Holding

and maintaining a space for reflection is important to an

ongoing process.