Previous Page  30 / 196 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 30 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

Proceedings of the Council

THE SOCIETY

22nd April 1971:

The President in the chair, also

present Messrs W. B. Allen, Bruce St. J. Blake, John

Carrigan, Anthony E. Collins, Gerard M. Doyle, Joseph

L. Dundon, James R. C. Green, Gerald Hickey, Chris-

topher Hogan, Michael P. Houlihan, Thomas Jackson

Junior, John B. Jermyn, Eunan McCarron, Patrick J.

McEllin, Patrick McEntee, John Maher, Patrick C.

Moore, Desmond Moran, Senator John J. Nash, George

A. Nolan, Patrick Noonan, John C. O'Carroll, Peter E.

O'Connell, Roderick J. O'Connor, Thomas Valentine

O'Connor, Patrick F. O'Donnell, James W. O'Donovan,

John O'Meara, David R. Pigot, Peter D. M. Prentice,

Mrs. Moya Quinlan, Robert McD. Taylor and Ralph

J. Walker.

The following was among the business transacted.

Court Offices—hours of business

The Council considered representations from members

that an application to the appropriate authority should

be made for a rule that all High Court offices should be

open for normal business hours throughout the year

including vacation periods. It was decided to refer the.

matter to the Dublin Solicitors' Bar Association for

consideration and report.

Publications

The Council received and approved a report from the

Publications Sub-Committee on projects in hand in-

cluding a work on

Irish Land Law

covering the Republic

and Northern Ireland by Mr. Wylie of Q.U.B., and a

textbook on

The Law of Evidence in Ireland

by Mr.

Cole of the Law School, Trinity College. The committee

reported that they were also considering a project for

subsidising a textbook on planning law but this had not

yet materialised.

Precedent bank and engrossment service

A report from the Public Relations and Services Com-

mittee stated that this project had advanced consid-

erably and that in the near future it was hoped to issue

a circular letter to members.

Complaints

Complaints were received from the Funeral Undertakers

Association of delays by certain solicitors in dealing

with accounts in solicitors' hands. Some of these accounts

were outstanding for a considerable time notwithstanding

the fact that they are regarded as preferential payments

in the administration. The Association had been advised

to put the matter in the hands of their solicitors. It was

also decided that the attention of members should be

drawn to this matter to avoid such complaints which

are damaging, if justified, to the reputation of the

profession.

A complaint had also been received from a firm of

law searchers of delay in payment of accounts of busi-

ness completed. The Council decided that these matters

should also be brought to the attention of the profession.

Accountants' queries

In a recent issue of the Society's

Gazette

it was stated

that the Council had decided not to take any action on

the question of a request by accountants for certificates

by solicitors acting for limited liability companies as to

any pending proceedings or liability of the company

which are required for audit purposes. The ground of

that decision was that there was no information before

the Council that company auditors as a general rule

are making this request. Since then members have

written in stating that the practice is becoming wide-

spread and that one firm had been asked for such a

certificate on at least three occasions recently. It was

decided to take the matter up with the Institute of

Chartered Accountants.

Agency between solicitors

A member who gave instructions to another to institute

proceedings arising out of an accident claimed one-

third agency commission. No prior arrangement had

been made for agency and the instructed solicitor dis-

claimed liability. A ruling was sought from the Council.

On a report from a committee it was stated that

Opinion DR 76 applies. If there was no antecedent

agreement or understanding "for agency commission it

is not payable.

Abortive auction

Property was put up for sale by public auction in 1965

and withdrawn as the reserved price was not reached.

In October 1968 following negotiations with another

purchaser a fresh contract of sale was prepared but the

purchaser withdrew before signature. In August 1969

further conditions were prepared and the property was

put up for sale by public auction but no bids were

received. Abortive negotiations took place on several

subsequent occasions. In February 1970 the property

was sold by private treaty. The same solicitor acted

throughout and asks for guidance as to the appropriate

charges.

The Council on a report from a committee stated

that the solicitor was entitled to charge three-quarters

of the scale fee on the reserve price of the first auction.

The charges for the other abortive auctions and negoti-

ations should be charged under Schedule 2. The com-

mission scale fee should be charged on the consideration

on the sale of the property in February 1970.

Sale of premises with contents

The abortive auctions and negotiations mentioned

above also included the sale of the contents of the

property. The successful sale of 1970 covered the prem-

ises only. The Council stated that in calculating three-

quarters of the commission scale fee on the first abortive

auction the reserved price should be apportioned if

possible between the premises and the contents. If this

is not possible the charge should be made under

Schedule 2.

Costs of bank as mortgagee

Solicitors who are not wholetime solicitors for a bank

acted for the bank as mortgagees on the occasion of a

mortgage for a substantial loan and enquired as to the

30