Previous Page  33 / 196 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 33 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

professions and other employments. It was pointed out

that the capacity of the transportable goods industries

to compete with imports depended not alone on their

own internal efficiency but also on the prices they had

to pay for materials and the services they bought in

Ireland and examples of these services given were legal,

auctioneering and architectural services, insurance and

financial facilities, building, electricity, gas and water.

It had been suggested in the N.I.E.G. report that there

should be procedures for referring restrictive practices

between persons and firms in the services shelter of the

economy to the Fair Trades Commission in order to

devise means of increasing competition in these activi-

ties. The Council naturally paid serious attention to

these statements and to later official announcements

that the restrictive trade practices legislation would be

amended and extended to bring professional services

within the scope of the Fair Trades Commission. This

had already been done by the Monopolies Commission

in England which held an inquiry into the solicitors

and other professions. The Council has made a

survey of earnings in a representative sample of solici-

tors' offices and the results have been analysed by the

Society's accountants. Steps have also been taken to

institute a time costing exercise in accordance with a

scheme drawn up with the assistance of the Society's

accountants and in which a number of offices will be

invited to participate. It is hoped that there will be a

wide response to this request because in order to present

the Society's case properly the Council must be armed

with adequate statistical and other information. The

areas of investigation envisaged are the fee structure of

the profession, the commission scale fee, cross subsidis-

ation and so-called restrictive practices. These practices

include the existing prohibitions against advertising,

supplanting, undercutting and Unfair attraction of

business by advertising or otherwise. If experience in

England is any guide it will be suggested that there

should be price competition between individual solici-

tors and offices and that solicitors should be free to

advertise their services and compete in the same way as

commercial and industrial concerns.

Terms of Reference of Fair Trade Commission

The terms of reference of the Commission are not yet

known as the legislation has not yet been published in

Bill form but officials of the Department have met

representatives of the Society on several occasions at

which, while accepting that legislation will be introduced,

the Council have put forward suggestions as to the form

which it should take. The Council are particularly

concerned that whatever form the legislation takes it

should not be accepted as a foregone conclusion that

price competition, advertising, undercutting and similar

practices are justified. The Council have no objection

whatever to such an inquiry and indeed welcome it

because they feel confident that an impartial investi-

gation will show that the public interest would not be

served by the commercialisation of the profession. This

is not said from any affection of superiority of the

professions over commerce but merely to indicate that

they are different and I do not intend here to enter

into the arguments on either side of the case. I am

concerned, however, to see that the terms of reference

of the commission will treat this matter as at least an

open question.

Reverting again to the time cost exercise I would like

to appeal to offices which have any interest in this mat-

ter to write in to the Secretary of the Society who will

supply them with a memorandum prepared by the

accountants which I think would repay careful perusal.

Participation in an exercise of this kind by a large

number of offices would be advantageous not alone to

the Society which deals with the matter in the interests

of the profession as a whole but to the individual offices

because it has been found that the adoption of time

costing methods and knowing what it costs to provide

different kinds of professional services has resulted in

increased profitability and efficiency where such methods

are used. In the strenuous years ahead the profession

must ever strive to increase its efficiency by amalga-

mation, equipment and by the adoption of progressive

methods of business and I feel certain that time costing

is a high priority.

Legal remuneration—Central Costs Committee

Discussions have continued between the Council and

the Minister for Justice on the subject of a single com-

mittee to regulate solicitors' remuneration. As mem-

bers are aware five different committees are concerned

with this matter, the most important being the statutory

body under the Solicitors' Remuneration Act, 1881,

which deals with non-contentious business geutu-ally.

There is a separate committee for each Court and lor

the Land Registry. The Council suggested as far back

as 1962 that a general costs committee should be

appointed which without interfering in any way with

the method or form of charges fixed by particular rules

committees would be empowered to authorise general

increases in all solicitors' costs by way of a percentage

addition to be added to existing charges. In a subsequent

discussion with the predecessor of the present Minister

in 1968 the committee again put forward this proposal

and suggested that there should be a single costs com-

mittee with public representation and the assistance of

chartered accountants which would make orders dealing

with solicitors' remuneration generally and would be

responsible to the Oireachtas. The Council were opposed

to a ministerial or executive veto on decisions of such

a committee as being contrary to the accepted principle

of professional independence.

The Minister for Justice met representatives of the

Rules Committees early in August 1970 and following

that meeting a circular was sent out to members on

September 10th last. Since then there have been two

meetings between the Minister personally, the first with

representatives of the Society, the Bar and represen-

tatives of the Rules Committees and the second with

representatives of the Society alone. I do not want to

go into any detail about these discussions but we are

hopeful that the Minister will accede to the proposals

put forward to him on behalf of the Society which I

am convinced would be in the public interest. Over a

large area of professional practice solicitors have no

exclusive rights and in these areas they are in the same

posiiton as architects, accountants and medical practi-

tioners with this difference that solicitors' charges are

controlled, while those of other professions are fixed by

the professional bodies themselves. It is accepted that

there is a case for supervision of charges in Court

proceedings for party and party costs which are paid

by parties other than clients and for non-contentious

work where there is exclusivity but for non-contentious

work where there is no exclusive right it is difficult to

see the logic or argument for external regulation. In

fact in Scotland the Law Society prescribes the scale of

non-contentious costs which is regarded with respect

but not necessarily as the final authority by the Courts.

External Control

Nevertheless the Council has accepted the principle

of external control by a broad based committee with

representation as I have said from the judiciary, the

professions, the public and representatives of the pro-

3$