Previous Page  30 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 30 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

spread across multiple tools (GUI

+ VHDL/Verilog), it may require

multiple engineers and increase

design risk.

Figure 4 illustrates an architecture

which uses a microcontroller

(MCU) to perform the sequencing

of digitally-controlled point of

load (DPOL) supplies. The MCU

manages the DPOLs using the Power

Management Bus (PMBus), a twowire

communications protocol based on

the I²C bus. This leaves the Control

PLD responsible for supporting the

board's housekeeping functions as

well as controlling any point-of-load

DC-DC converters which have an

analog control interface (APOLs).

To simplify the software design, most

MCU-driven power management

designs

employ

Time-Based

sequencing schemes which issue

a single fixed sequence of disable

signals to power down the board

when a normal turn-off is requested

or when a fault condition is detected.

Another potential drawback of

software-based power management

is that it is slower to respond to

fault conditions (typically 10-15

milliseconds versus the microsecond-

scale response of a Control PLD).

If some fault conditions require a

faster response (or Event-Based

sequencing), a second layer of

protection may be added using the

Control PLD.

Implementing

software-based

Power Management requires both,

software for the MCU and a Control

PLD design, written in either VHDL

or Verilog.

Pros:

Designs are easily scalable

(for time-based sequencing only).

Abundant

software

development tools make MCU-based

solutions faster and easier to debug.

Designs can be quickly

modified using firmware updates.

Simpler PCB designs -

routing congestion reduced around

DPOLs

Cons:

More expensive BOM

Difficult to scale if Event

Based sequencing is required.

Multiple design tools required

(Verilog/VHDL + Software)

Mix of APOL & DPOL requires

a hybrid control solution which has

several drawbacks:

o

It cannot be simulated easily.

o

Hardware

management

functions can only be tested in a

prototype board environment.

o

Complexity increases system

Fig.6: The L-ASC10 remote sensing element.

Fig.7: - A Hardware Management system implemented using a

distributed architecture

Power Architecture #5: Power Management and

Housekeeping performed by a Control PLD with L-ASC10

(ASC) providing Distributed Voltage Sensing & control

30 l New-Tech Magazine Europe