517 / 696
Silliker
Chem, Res. Center Crete, IL – Report of A Validation of LC-MS/MS Method for Folate Analys
13
Figure 3: Chromatograms of a solvent blank (methanol).
Sodium salt vs. Free Ascorbic acid
In the original AOAC method, the sodium ascorbate rather than ascorbic acid was used. It will not make
any difference in the extraction buffer because the pH was adjusted to 6.0 using sodium hydroxide. However, for
the SPE elution solvent and final injection solvent, the pH was not adjusted. A small test of the elution solvent
made either with sodium ascorbate or ascorbic acid (formic acid/methanol/ascorbate v/v/w 10:90:1) was carried
out. The SPE eluates from the two elution solvent gave the same response and made no difference for both the
peak shape and intensity. The chromatograms from both of the treatments are presented in Figures 8 and 9.
XICof +MRM(14pairs): 442.200/295.200DaID: FA-295fromSample17(Solvent ) of HSST3_121130_01.wiff (TurboSpray)
Max. 60.0cps.
4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.0 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8
2 18 33 49 64 80 96 111 127 142 158 173 189 205 220 236 251 267 283 298
Time, min
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
In te n sity, cp s
2011.06/Fol-22 (February 2016)
FOR ERP USE ONLY
DO NOT DISTRIBUTE