Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  209 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 209 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

195

CYIL 7 ȍ2016Ȏ TOWARDS A NEW CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTON OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS

De Hert and Mantovani do, whether

“with regards to a prospective treaty /…/ it is

advisable “to take a few steps back in order to jump””.

90

Taking a few steps back does

not mean to abandon the project but, rather, it means to carefully consider all its

implications. Thus, we should jump but before doing so, we should give a thought to

where we want to get (and where we do not want to get), how much energy we are

ready to invest into the exercise and why we have decided to engage in this activity

(instead of jogging or playing chess) in the first place. This consideration will not

probably lead us to miraculous records but it might help us avoid certain holes into

which we might otherwise fall. And if we decide to jump with a pole, it might also

allow us – and the older persons themselves – to get over barriers which have seemed

unsurmountable up to now. And, of course, jumping, and engaging in other forms

of physical (or mental) activity should also increase the chance that we will enjoy our

old age in strong health. Although adopting a convention is obviously not a perfect

analogy to jumping, the reasons underlying it seem to speak, albeit in cautious terms,

in favour of a new instrument. And also in favour of jumping, of course…

Conclusions

The term older persons means different things in different times and places. In

recent years, it has mostly been linked to the global process of ageing which results

from a rapid increase in life expectancy and a changing ration between younger and

older persons.

Viewed from that perspective – which obviously is not the only one we could

embrace – older people are identified on the basis of chronological age as those above 60,

with some regional variations (50 in Africa, 65 in the EU). Older persons clearly

do not constitute a homogeneous group. They have different life stories, different

experience, different skills, different needs, different hobbies, different problems, etc.

Yet, the portraying of the global process of ageing as a negative phenomenon that

places an unprecedented burden on society gives rise to stereotypes and prejudices

against those who are seen responsible for this change, i.e. older persons, thus turning

them into a special social group. The (alleged) members of this (alleged) group may

then be subject to various discriminatory practices and other age-specific human

rights violations (elderly abuse, etc.). They suffer group-based vulnerability which,

although resulting from social construction, is real enough to bring harm on them.

And, consequently, to merit consideration.

The current human rights law extends to older persons as to any other individuals.

Furthermore, over the past decades, special provisions relating to older persons have

been included into binding instruments. The UN and other international organizations

have also issued various soft law documents centred specifically on older persons (the

90

DE HERT, Paul, MANTOVANI, Eugenio, Specific Human Rights for Older Persons?,

supra note 71

,

p. 318.