442
PAVEL ŠTURMA
CYIL 7 ȍ2016Ȏ
specifically to them. Conduct of other actors is not practice that contributes to the
formation of rules of CIL but may be relevant when assessing the practice of States
or international organizations. According to conclusion 5, State practice consists of
conduct of the State, whether in the exercise of its executive, legislative, judicial or
other functions. Practice may take a wide range of forms. It includes both physical
and verbal acts. It may, under certain circumstances, include inaction. Conclusion 6
also provides examples of forms of State practice. All available practice of a particular
State are to be assessed as a whole (conclusion 7). The practice must be general,
which means that it must be sufficiently widespread, representative and consistent
(conclusion 8). No particular duration is required, provided that the practice is
general.
Part Four addresses the requirement of acceptance as law (
opinio juris
). It means
that the practice in question must be undertaken with a sense of legal right or
obligation. Conclusion 10 provides examples of forms of evidence of acceptance
as law. Failure to react over time to a practice may serve as evidence of
opinio juris
,
“provided that States were in a position to react and the circumstances called for
some reaction”.
13
Part Five includes draft conclusions 11 to 14 dealing with the role of treaties,
resolutions of international organizations and intergovernmental conferences, decisions
of courts and tribunals (both international and national), teachings of the most highly
qualified publicists (i.e. doctrine). The two final parts (conclusions 15 and 16) relate
to the persistent objector and particular customary international law (whether
regional, local or other). To have the effect of non-opposability the objection to a rule
in the process of formation must be clearly expressed, made known to other States,
and maintained persistently.
14
Nevertheless, the issue of persistent objector was one
of the most debated and criticized by some members of the ILC. It had and will also
have impact on the discussion on the determination of
jus cogens
norms.
2.3 Subsequent agreements and subsequent practice in relation
to the interpretation of treaties
With respect to this topic, the Commission had before it the fourth report of
the Special Rapporteur Georg Nolte,
15
which addressed the legal significance of
pronouncements of expert treaty bodies and of decisions of domestic courts. The
report also discussed the structure and scope of the draft conclusions.
Following on the debate in Plenary and the Drafting Committee, the Commission
adopted on first reading a set of 13 draft conclusions, together with commentaries
thereto.
16
It also decided to transmit the draft conclusions to Governments for
13
Doc. A/CN.4/883, p. 5.
14
Ibid
., pp. 6-7.
15
See doc. A/CN.4/694 (2016).
16
See doc. A/CN.4/L.884, A/CN.4/L.884/Add.1 and Add. 2 (2016).