Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  458 / 536 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 458 / 536 Next Page
Page Background

444

PAVEL ŠTURMA

CYIL 7 ȍ2016Ȏ

parties may arise from their reactions to the practice of an international organization, or

they may be expressed in the practice of an organization of a constituent instrument.

21

By contrast, the practice of the organization as such may only contribute to the

interpretation of that instrument when applying Articles 31, para. 1, and 32 of the

Vienna Convention.

22

Finally, draft conclusion 13, adopted this year, refers to

pronouncements of expert treaty bodies.

23

Their relevance is subject to the applicable

rules of the treaty (para. 2). A pronouncement of an expert treaty body may give rise

to, or refer to, a subsequent agreement or subsequent practice by parties (para. 3).

In addition, this draft conclusion is without prejudice to the contribution that

a pronouncement of an expert treaty body may otherwise make to the interpretation

of a treaty (para. 4).

2.4 Crimes against humanity

Since the ILC decided, in 2014, to include in its programme the topic Crimes

against humanity, this year it considered the second report of the Special Rapporteur

Sean Murphy,

24

which addressed,

inter alia

, criminalization under national law,

establishment of national jurisdiction, general investigation and cooperation for

identifying alleged offenders, exercise of national jurisdiction when an alleged

offender is present, the obligation

aut dedere aut judicare

and fair treatment of an

alleged offender. In addition, the Commission had before it the memorandum by the

Secretariat providing information on existing treaty-based monitoring mechanisms

which may be of relevance to the future work of the ILC.

25

After the debate in Plenary, the Commission decided to refer the proposed draft

articles to the Drafting Committee. Upon consideration of the report of the Drafting

Committee, the ILC provisionally adopted draft articles 5 to 10, together with

commentaries.

26

As a result of the debate in Plenary and a concept paper presented by

the Special Rapporteur, the ILC also decided to refer to the Drafting Committee the

question of the liability of legal persons. Following its consideration of a further report

of the Drafting Committee,

27

the Commission provisionally adopted paragraph 7 of

draft article 5 with the commentary.

The six adopted draft articles, modelled according to other modern multilateral

treaties in the area of international criminal law, address a wide range of issues.

According to draft article 5, each State shall take the necessary measures to ensure

that crimes against humanity constitute offences under its criminal law (para. 1).

21

Ibid

., p. 97.

22

Ibid

., pp. 101-103.

23

See doc. A/CN.4/L.884/Add.2, p. 3 ff.

24

See doc. A/CN.4/690 (2016).

25

See doc. A/CN.4/698 (2016).

26

See doc. A/CN.4/L.873 (2016).

27

See doc. A/CN.4/L.873/Add.1.