Background Image
Previous Page  71 / 112 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 71 / 112 Next Page
Page Background

EuroWire – November 2009

69

technical article

A major improvement in chip design in

the last two decades has been the ability

to withstand, and continue operating

with, large amounts of reflected signals.

The ideal passive device would be exactly

75 ohms with no reflection at all, but this

is not possible. This is where the return loss

guarantee, previouslymentioned, becomes

a serious requirement to maximise the

HD performance of cable, connectors and

similar components.

One should also note that the SMPTE

return loss requirement (–15 dB or

3.16% reflection) is extremely generous.

Installers are cautioned that component

manufacturers who claim to meet the

SMPTE standard are suggesting only that

their components are no better than the

minimum requirement, not a very positive

start to an installation.

Translate to 1080p/60

When converting to 1080p/60, the clock is

doubled to 1.5 GHz, and the third harmonic

raised to 4.5 GHz. Memory space, tape,

disc, hard-drive size is essentially halved to

store these images, audio, and metadata.

The standards for this are contained in

SMPTE 424M. Return loss minimum, under

this extended specification is –15 dB to 1.5

GHz and –10 dB to 3 GHz

[note2]

. Components

should be tested to 4.5 GHz and some

return loss guarantee should be assigned.

One cable manufacturer now routinely

tests many of its HD cables to this new HD

standard with a guarantee of –23 dB from

5 MHz to 1.6 GHz and –21 dB from 1.6 GHz

to 4.5 GHz. A similar guarantee should be

sought for all passive devices.

Cable distance

Digital signals have a significant problem

with distance. Receiving chips can perform

basic error correction until the error rate

becomes greater than the chip can handle.

This means that the digital image is perfect

until that critical distance where the data,

the image, can no longer be resolved.

The chip rapidly goes from perfect picture

to no picture in only a few feet of cable.

This is commonly called the digital cliff.

The real concern is that an installer or user

could be inches away from the cliff, and

not know it. By simply inserting a patch

cable, even a patch cable specifically made

for digital signals, the user might push that

signal over the cliff.

In the SMPTE 292M standard, there is

a formula to determine the maximum

distance on any given cable. It simply states

than when the signal drops 20 dB at half

the clock frequency, that is the distance

limit.

Table 3

shows some common cable

sizes with this calculated distance for HD.

Also shown is the maximum distance

for SMPTE 424M, running 1080p/60, again

20 dB loss at half the clock.

However, the distances in

Table 3

are

based on a formula, not on real-world

applications. The real-world distances are

obviously very chip-dependent and really

good chip sets would perform over longer

distances than those shown

[note4]

.

The distances in

Table 3

are approximately

halfway to the digital cliff with an average

chip set. Thus, a user could probably double

these distances before reaching the cliff.

The numbers shown are, therefore, ‘safe’

numbers, designed to keep an installation

operational even when there are flaws, a

poor connector or two, a bent cable or an

older device with yesterday’s chips.

Testing distance

If it is decided not to rely on

Table 3

, or

similar distance charts, then cables must

be tested. Given that a high-quality

network analyser can cost $60,000 or

more, most installers are content to use

a chart. There are, however, ways to test

HD and 1080p/60 for little or no cost and

determine, in an approximate way, where

the cliff is. To be most effective, an installer

should use a single cable type, produced

by a single manufacturer. Mixing cables

and manufacturers makes the situation

even more unpredictable.

Testing requires an HD source. It doesn’t

matter what the source is as long as it

produces the appropriate HD or 1080p/60

output. Also required is an HD or 1080p

monitor. A professional broadcast-quality

display has one valuable feature: the image

can be shifted so that the centre of the

monitor is the black ‘retrace’ area between

images. When looking for bit errors, these

will show as flashes of pixels, the most

recognisable being a black pixel turning

white (where 0 is misread as 1).

A normal video image can often hide these

bit errors, especially if the image is ‘busy’,

so the black inter-frame area is the best

choice. Then it must be decided how far

to be from the digital video cliff. Whether

ten, twenty or fifty feet, once a number is

chosen the tester will take a piece of cable

of that length, matching the coax cable

used in the installation. Assuming for this

example that a distance of 50 feet has

been chosen, the tester will take a piece

of cable that is 50 feet long. Connectors

should be attached at each end and, at

one end, a female-to-female adaptor. This

adaptor must have low return loss at the

highest frequency required to pass. It is a

male-to-female ‘extension cable’.

The installer simply adds this extension

cable to any existing cable under test

between the HD source and the monitor

– it can be added at the source or desti-

nation end, it is simply extending the

original installed cable. If, after a few

seconds, small white flashes cannot be

seen in the black inter-frame area, then

the cable length is at least 50 feet short

of the cliff. If flashes are discernible, it

could mean that the cable under test is

damaged, the connectors poorly attached,

or the wrong connectors or cable used.

It could mean that the cable under test is

simply too long for that signal.

There is a choice of solutions: check the

cable and connectors, replace it temporarily

to test if it is creating the problem.

Move equipment in the rack to change the

length of cable, or change to a larger cable

with lower loss.

Return loss

Match Reflected

-10 dB

90%

10%

-15 dB

96.84% 3.16%

-20 dB

99%

1%

-21 dB

99.21% 0.79%

-23 dB

99.5% 0.5%

-25 dB

99.68% 0.32%

-30 dB

99.9% 0.1%

-35 dB

99.97% 0.03%

-40 dB

99.99% 0.01%

Table 2

:

Return loss versus match

Cable

Diameter

HD distance 1080p/60 distance

7731A RG-11

0.405"

550

ft

360

ft

1694A RG-6

0.275"

400

ft

270

ft

1505A RG-59

0.235"

310

ft

220

ft

1855A 'Mini'

0.159"

260

ft

150

ft

179DT 'Micro'

0.100"

110

ft

80

ft

Table 3

:

Cable distance by cable type and signal