Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  28 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 28 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

Environment and Security

28

supplies) Georgia, Azerbaijan and Kaza-

khstan in order to strengthen the capacity of

local forces to protect oil–related infrastruc-

ture (Klare, 2004). The new US doctrine fore-

sees the establishment of US military facili-

ties in the Caspian region (so-called Forward

Operating Locations) (Klare, 2006) – possibly

in Azerbaijan or Kazakhstan.

Deploying military forces in such a region

modifies the balance of power between ac-

tors. The August 2008 military actions in

Georgia, which is strategically positioned

on the oil routes from the Caspian Sea to

the Black and Mediterranean seas, coupled

with alleged terrorist attacks on the BTC

pipeline in north-east Turkey over the same

period, underline the high vulnerability of

the energy infrastructure to conflicts and

instability

22

.

The military presence has increased in the

Caspian region over the last ten years, with

coastal states increasing military spend-

ing and modernizing military infrastructure

(Katlik, 2004)

23

. At present there are large

disparities in military strength between the

five Caspian states. The Caspian being a

maritime region, the naval component is

particularly important. Russia and Iran are

the leading naval forces in the region, while

Kazakhstan

24

and Turkmenistan are invest-

ing in increasing their military forces in the

region and upgrading capacity.

The 2001 Iran-Azerbaijan confrontation

25

is

an illustration of the security risks related

to the unresolved legal status of the Cas-

pian Sea. However, since then there have

been no other inter-state military confronta-

tions although states have been strength-

ening their naval forces and border troops

in the region. Certainly all the actors are

well aware of the negative political and

economic impact of military conflict in the

region where even a limited confrontation

between two or more coastal states would

be enough to slow or halt offshore explora-

tion and put investors to flight. Further sig-

nificant investment in the energy sector will

only occur if there is political stability and

security in the region.