Previous Page  52 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 52 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

50

ACQ

Volume 13, Number 1 2011

ACQ

uiring knowledge in speech, language and hearing

Research updates

Anne van

Bysterveldt

Nearly 90% of children were able to produce 50 utterances;

however mean length of utterance in morphemes (MLU-M)

was generally low with over one-third of children producing

PN samples with MLU-M of < 2. High point analysis revealed

that most children produced early developing PN narrative

structures, with only 4 children producing a PN with a high

point.

Overall, the results of these investigations identified

widespread and persistent spoken and written language

disorder in school-aged children with DS. In addition, while

home and school literacy environments were generally

positive, and children were receiving regular reading

instruction, many children were not equipped with the

necessary prerequisite skills to enable them to become

independent readers. These findings also highlighted

the need for early, focused and integrated intervention

to facilitate language development and to better prepare

children with DS for the language learning environment at

school.

To investigate the impact of an early intervention strategy,

10 pre-school children with DS participated in an integrated

intervention linking spoken and written language and

designed to simultaneously facilitate speech production,

letter name and sound knowledge and phonological

awareness. The intervention contained three components:

a parent-led home-based reading program using print

referencing techniques to draw the child’s attention to

intervention targets, a computer-based program and an

activities-based speech therapy component, all focusing

on the same speech, letter name and letter sound targets.

All 10 children made statistically significant gains on

speech production targets and the majority of children also

showed an increase in letter knowledge and phonological

awareness skills (van Bysterveldt, Gillon, & Foster-Cohen,

2010a). Follow-up assessments after 2 terms of formal

schooling revealed 7 of the 10 children made continued

improvements in speech and phonological awareness skills

and 5 children demonstrated some generalisation of these

skills to real word reading and spelling (van Bysterveldt,

Gillon, & Foster-Cohen, 2008a). These results suggest

an integrated phonological awareness intervention which

simultaneously targets speech, phonological awareness and

letter knowledge can be effective in facilitating development

in these skills for young children with DS.

Findings of these studies have identified the need for

longitudinal research into spoken and written language

development in children with DS to allow for the evaluation of

specific early interventions within a preventative framework.

The persistent nature of language difficulties in individuals

with DS also suggests the need for sustained interventions.

The evaluation of home- and classroom-based activities to

promote spoken and written language development in this

population is also warranted.

I

ndividuals with Down syndrome (DS) have a phenotypic

spoken and written language profile which includes

elements of both delay and disorder, with considerable

variation reported (e.g., Miller & Leddy, 1998). Significant

advances have been made in understanding the spoken

and written language in this population and the directions

interventions might take. However, little is known about

the language profiles of these children in the New Zealand

(NZ) cultural and educational environment. Over the last 5

years, joint research between the Champion Centre and the

University of Canterbury has focused on addressing this gap

by investigating spoken and written language development in

NZ children with DS. The first sizeable national investigation

to be carried out in NZ involved 88 school-aged children,

comprising an estimated 15% of children with DS receiving

instruction in years 1–8 in NZ schools. Children’s parents

and teachers completed comprehensive questionnaires

investigating the home and school literacy environment. The

majority of homes were rich in literacy resources and children

and parents read together on a regular basis. However,

parents reported that many children took a very passive role

during these interactions, that fewer than one third of the

children had complete letter name and sound knowledge,

and that only 25% of the children were regular independent

readers (van Bysterveldt, Gillon, & Foster-Cohen, 2010b).

Teachers reported that nearly all children took part in regular

classroom reading instruction, most frequently in small

groups or in a one-on-one context. Teachers’ reports of

children’s literacy skills were largely in line with those of

parents. Far fewer children were reported to take part in

regular writing compared to reading activities, both in the

classroom and for allocated homework.

To investigate the development of phonological

awareness, letter knowledge and decoding skills, 77 of these

children completed further assessments. Results revealed a

wide range of phonological awareness and decoding skills

with some children demonstrating mastery of phoneme

identity and letter knowledge tasks while others were unable

to achieve correct scores on any assessment measure.

Twenty-four percent of children were unable to read any

words correctly and 6.6% were able to decode at a level

expected for 7–8 year old children. Analysis of data by age

group (5–8 and 9–14) revealed the development of skills with

maturation. As a group, older children achieved significantly

higher scores than younger children on all measures (van

Bysterveldt, Gillon, & Foster-Cohen, 2008b).

The 31 children who could decode 10 or more words

on a standardised reading test were invited to complete

additional assessments of speech, reading accuracy and

comprehension, and personal narrative (PN) production.

Twenty-six children completed these assessments and

produced analysable PN transcripts that were at least 60%

intelligible (van Bysterveldt, Westerveld, Gillon, & Foster-

Cohen, submitted). Results revealed considerable variability.

Spoken and written language

development in children with

Down syndrome

Anne van Bysterveldt