Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  319 / 328 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 319 / 328 Next Page
Page Background

First Action Recommendation

ER 1 Yes

ER 2

Yes, I do recommend the method to be adopted as First Action Method by ERP after authors have

explained the following two limitation of the method in application. 1. The method in the current

format is not be easily applicable to foods/feeds high in phenolic compounds (e.g. beets, red sorghum

grain). 2. Oats beta-glucan interfere in the assay and provide values above LOD = 0.31 +/- 0.09%.

ER 3

Yes. Recommend consideration of allowing HPLC as an option to measure liberated glucose to

calculate %dietary starch. This approach would also measure free, inherent glucose and track if

sucrose-digestion has occurred.

ER 4

Yes

ER 5

Yes.

ER 6

Yes

ER 7

yes

ER 8

Yes

After First Action Recommendation

ER 1 Use feedback

ER 2

NA

ER 3

Recommend consideration of allowing HPLC as an option to measure liberated glucose to calculate

%dietary starch. This approach would also measure free, inherent glucose and track if sucrose-

digestion has occurred. Decision needed if single or multiple lab work is needed to verify.

ER 4

Just the normal 2 year feedback period. Collaborative is completed and complete.

ER 5

N/A

ER 6

It would be good to test the performance of the method when an alternative glucose assay is used.

Clarify the reason why dextrin recovery is low.

ER 7

no

ER 8

That included in the text above. (Please clarify)

ERP PROFILE SUMMARIES

279