Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  116 / 311 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 116 / 311 Next Page
Page Background

AOAC RESEARCH INSTITUTE

AOAC

OFFICIAL METHODS OF ANALYSIS

(OMA)

OMAMAN-15

:

Determination Of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) In Seafood Using

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: A Collaborative Study*

Study Director: Katerina Mastovska, Covance Laboratories Inc., Nutritional Chemistry and Food safety, 3301 Kinsman Boulevard,

Madison, WI 53704, USA

Analytical Range

ER 1

Varies depending on the analyte. Generally, low is from 2 ppb to 25 ppb. High is 20 ppb to 250 ppb.

ER 2

Range varies and is dependent on the specific analyte. This is appropriate as lower molecular weight PAHs are generally

found in higher concentrations than higher molecular weight PAHs. It is acceptable for this application as levels of concern

for low molecular weight PAHs are significantly higher.

ER 3

Sufficient.

ER 4

BaP: 0.5 - 100 μg/kg (0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100) Other PAHs: 1.25 - 250 μg/kg (1.25, 2.5, 5, 12.5, 25, 50, 125, 250) naphthalene:

2.5 - 500 μg/kg (2.5, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 250, 500)

ER 5

Good

ER 6

Suitable

ER 7

0.5 to 100 ug/kg for BaP and other lower-level PAHs; 1.25 to 250 ug/kg for higher-level PAHs; and 2.5 to 500 ug/g for

naphthalene.

ER 8

good

LOQ

ER 1

Not discussed in the method. Likely in the low ppbs.

ER 2

LOQ varies and is dependent on the specific analyte. This is appropriate as lower molecular weight PAHs are generally

found in higher concentrations than higher molecular weight PAHs. It is acceptable for this application as levels of concern

for low molecular weight PAHs are significantly higher.

ER 3

Please see comment above about spike levels and LOQ of BaP.

ER 4

Bap: 0.5 μg/kg Other PAHs: 1.25 μg/kg naphthalene: 2.5 μg/kg

ER 5

Good

ER 6

Suitable

ER 7

1 ug/kg for BaP and other lower-level PAHs; 2.5 ug/g for higher-level PAHs; and 5 ug/g for naphtalene.

ER 8

good

Accuracy/Recovery

ER 1

Varies depending on the analyte. 70-120% mostly.

ER 2

Accuracy/Recovery is high and meets validation criteria.

ER 3

Good

ER 4

In shrimp: 83.8-115% In mussel: 77.3-107% In oyster: 71.6-94.6%, except for a lower mean recovery of 68.6% for

benzo[α]anthracene (BaA) in oyster, and 50.3-56.5% and 48.2-49.7% for anthracene and beno[α]pyrene, respectively.

ER 5

Good

ER 6

As noted by the authors, the recoveries for the oyster tissue are low and probably inadequate.

ER 7

After excluding the outliers, the mean recoveries (8-10 labs) are in the range of 70-120% with a few exceptions which may

due to the compound degradation in oyster samples stored at -20 C.

ER 8

good