Previous Page  144 / 736 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 144 / 736 Next Page
Page Background

confidence of his clients. Besides his function

in

the1

courts the solicitor provides a host of other services for

his clients which are, if less in the public eye, almost

equally important. He carries on negotiations for them

with various public officials and departments and helps

them with advice and assistance in a wide variety of

matters ranging from the- humble matter of social welfare

benefit to tax planning and business reconstruction. The

activity of the central and local government is so per

vasive and so intimately interwoven with the everyday

life of even the humblest person and these matters are

so complex that it

is absolutely essential that he has

competent advice easily and quickly available. This is

the service which the solicitor has to supply and his

function in

the machinery of

the democratic process.

For many of these services he

is far from adequately

remunerated indeed in some cases he received no reward

at all. I take this opportunity to reject utterly that

allegation that solicitors rarely, if ever, give their ser

vices for nothing. It is not only untrue but manifestly

untrue. In this country we have as yet no civil legal aid,

but yet it is the proud boast of the profession that no

litigant with an action to take or defend in which he

had a case to make was denied the services of a solicitor

solely because he had no money to pay him. Civil legal

aid in England costs something in

the order of five

million a year to the state to give the same service that

is carried by the profession in this country. Not merely

that the solicitor gives his own personal time and energy

but he also provides the office machinery to give prac

tical effect to these services for which, of course, he has

to pay as well as paying for court fees, stamps, witnesses

and so on, so that where a solicitor gives his sendees

without remuneration he is in addition putting his hand

into his own pocket and is at a financial loss. The service

given by a solicitor to the public particularly in rural

areas is one which cannot be replaced by any known

substitutes and anything which endangers the existence

of that service without providing any adequate alternative

is clearly inamicable to the public interest.

In recent years rising costs and falling population in

many areas and increasing complexity of legislation is

making it progressively more difficult for the solicitor in

some areas at any rate to continue to carry on. In many

cases it is extremely difficult to find staff at any price.

This is particularly true of one-man practices of which

there

is a

large number of the country; the obvious

remedy is

to amalgamate into larger multiple partner

firms. This will probably be the trend of the future but

it will be slow in accomplishment and bring its disad

vantages. First of all

the solicitor will become more

remote both geographically and psychologically from

his client. In the present arrangement the client sees the

one solicitor for all his business but in a multiple partner

firm he will see one partner for one thing and another

partner for another and the result would be a

loss of

that personal

relationship which

is

such a valuable

feature of a small firm. It has also been alleged that

solicitors are in many cases wanting in competence. I

have taken the opportunity during the past few months

of visiting solicitors in all parts of Ireland and I am

impressed at the high degree of expertise that is dis

played by solicitors all over Ireland, many of

them

working in some of the most difficult conditions.

Consideration of these matters has naturally led your

Council to re-examine its function. Heretofore the role

of the Council has been protective in two senses: it has

the duty of protecting the interests of its members on the

one hand and the duty of protecting the interests of the

public by ensuring a proper standard of education, com-

4

petence and ethics in the members of the profession. In

the future this Council will have to become promotional.

Again this will have two aspects, the active promotion

of the interest of its members and the active promotion

of the interest of the public. This thinking has led to

some of the proposals which follow.

CONSULTATIVE SERVICE

It has been suggested to the Council that in view of

the increasing need lor specialisation, that some sort ol

consultative arrangement between

solicitors might be

sponsored by the Society. It is quite impossible for a

solicitor in general practice to be a complete expert in

all aspects of his professional activity, consequently he

usually confines his expertise to those fields in which it

is most frequently demanded of him. Fields in which he

is unlikely to be consulted he leaves out of his reckoning

altogether, e.g. it would be rather pointless for a solicitor

in Tipperary to make a close study of admiralty law and

practice. If by some freak he did find himself presented

with such a problem it would be an ideal arrangement

if he could refer to some firm who held itself out to

specialise in this particular field and allow that firm to

take over all or part of the work for him on some kind

of a profit sharing basis. This scheme has obvious advan

tages, it encourages a higher degree of specialisation in

the firms offering the sendee and it should provide an

excellent service for the solicitor not specialising in that

particular field. There are obvious difficulties in the way

of

this type of arrangement but

they should not be

insuperable.

The matter in any case is being closely investigated

by the Council and it is hoped that something construc

tive will result.

INFORMATION SERVICE

There has been for some

time past a considerable

volume of opinion that the Society should use some kind

of a public relations service and let it be said straight

away that there was and is a good deal of difference of

opinion as to the advisability of such a service. Most of

the arguments for and against when examined closely

turn out to be based on an infinite variety of conceptions

of what the service is going to be. I prefer, therefore, if

the term "Public Relations" were dropped altogether

and some alternative term such as "Information Service"

used instead. The Council has before them a report of a

committee which was appointed quire recently to study

this problem and the members of that committee are to

be complimented on the speed and thoroughness with

which they carried out their work. Briefly what is pro

posed is that a completely new branch of the secretariat

should be formed. It will provide an information service

for the profession. It will collect and digest all publica

tions and happenings in the legal and legislative world

and in the commercial world of interest to the profession

and will communicate this digested information to the

individual members of

the profession by means of a

journal incorporating the

Gazette

issued at the maximum

possible frequency, weekly if possible, certainly not less

frequently than monthly. It would also be available for

enquiries. It should also be able to carry on a modest

amount of legal research upon which proposals for law

reform can be based. On the other hand it will keep the

public informed so far as possible of various ways

in

which they and their interests are effected by changes in

law and the services which are available to them in our

profession and the desireability of using these services.

In this aspect of activity of the information service it

may be necessary to employ outside agencies on a part-