Previous Page  234 / 736 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 234 / 736 Next Page
Page Background

Disciplinary Committee

The President of the High Court has appointed

Thomas V. O'Connor to be a member of the

Disciplinary Committee.

9th January 1969: The President in the chair,

also present Messrs Desmond J. Collins, James

R. C. Green, Francis J. Lanigan, John Carrigan,

Gerald Y. Goldberg, Robert McD. Taylor, Bruce

St. J. Blake, Gerald Hickey, James W. O'Donovan,

Augustus Cullen, Rory O'Connor, John J. Nash,

Desmond Moran, Peter E. O'Connell, Joseph

Dundon, W. A. Osborne, P. C. Moore, Brendan

A. McGrath, John Maher, William M. Cahir,

Gerard M. Doyle, Peter D. M. Prentice, T. V.

O'Connor, Patrick Noonan, Ralph J. Walker,

Christopher Hogan.

Committee on Reformatory and Industrial Schools

At the request of the Department of Education

the Council appointed a sub-committee to report

to

this

committee.

John B.

Jermyn, Patrick

Noonan and W. A. Osborne were appointed to

the sub-committee.

Classified Telephone Directory

|

The Council approved of a report of the Privileges

Committee disapproving of the use of bold type

by solicitors in this directory.

i

Criminal Justice Bill

!

The Council appointed a sub-committee to con

sider and report on the contents of this Bill with

.a view to making a public statement as to

its

effect on the rights and liberties of the citizens.; A

sub-committee was appointed to consider the mat

ter; the following were appointed to

the sub

committee: Gerald Y. Goldberg, Bruce St. J. Blake,

Rory O'Connor.

THE FUTURE OF THE PROFESSION

by CHARLES A. FRASER, W.S.

Charles Annand Frascr was born on 16th October

1928. He was educated at Hamilton Academy, his

father being the parish minister there. He did two

years of National Service as a Lieutenant in the

Royal Artillery. Thereafter he was at Edinburgh

University, graduating in Arts and Law. He ap

prenticed with Messrs Baillie and Gifford, W.S.

He has been a partner in the firm of Messrs W.

and J. Burness, W.S., since June 1956. He is a

member of the Council of the Law Society of

Scotland. Married with

three

sons, his home

address is Shepherd House, Inveresk, Midlothian.

PART I

Lawyers may,

in

the past, have

tended to be

slightly conservative, perhaps more concerned with

preserving their status than being vitally interested

in t':e expansion of their functions; more defen

sive than aggressive; and always over-anxious lest

any change should alter the character of the pro

fession which they have chosen; a profession which

has remained substantially unaffected by change

over many generations. To be conservative and to

res st change in

the coming years will not be

possible. Change may well be forced upon the

profession from outside if it is not accepted from

within. Recently the National Board for Prices

and Incomes Report Number 54 on the Remun

eration of Solicitors made some valuable propo

sals. The Monopolies Commission's Report on the

Professions is awaited with interest.

Perhaps it is as well to summarise briefly some

of the obvious changes in society that are taking

place around us and which must, in time, affect

the practice of the law. Wealth is more widely

spread; the population of the world is increasing

at a frightening speed; families are more mobile in

that where, formerly, several generations in one

family might all live and work in the one area,

now, promotion within large groups demands that

employees move from one part of the country to

another not only once but possibly several times

during their working lives; criticism is not spared;

previously accepted ideas are now challenged and

the public wants to know "Why?"; a consequence

of the social welfare state has been

the huge

increase in the annual amount of complex legis

lation affecting the life of virtually every citizen;

legislation which was formerly complicated but

understood by some including most lawyers is now

unbelievably complicated and understood by few

—not even by many lawyers; the modern indus

trial state, as Professor Galbraith observed | in his

Reith Lectures, seems to require that business is

organised

in massive groups with a significant

effect on the communities in which such industrial

giants operate; and lastly and probably most im

portant, the change which may in time have the

most dramatic affect on

the

legal profession,

namely, the invention of the computer.

These are but some of the changes that are

affecting society and must consequently affect the

practice of law. Perhaps therefore we should now

90