Previous Page  469 / 736 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 469 / 736 Next Page
Page Background

N.I.E.C. could not effectively carry the discussion

of farmers' incomes further than this. It hoped,

however,

that

this deficiency would

soon be

remedied.

The report showed that if the position of lower-

income workers were

to be

improved, other

workers would have to accept increases less than

justified by the rise in national production.

"The effectiveness of incomes and prices will

depend", it said "on the percentage increase in

aggregate money incomes being so related to the

percentage increase in national production that

competitiveness is not endangered. It follows that

if some groups get a percentage increase higher

than this, others must accept a lower percentage

increase. If they do not, then the rise in total

money incomes will be excessive.

"This principle is particularly relevant where

efforts are directed to raising the relative position

of low-income groups in the community.

By

definition, the increase for these groups must be

greater than

the national average in order to

improve their relative position and other groups

must accept

a.

smaller increase".

More productivity

If the pay of low-paid workers was to be raised

to the socially desirable level, intensive efforts were

needed to raise the productivity of the enterprises

in which they were employed or to offer them

opportunities to transfer to enterprises which were

more productive.

In addition to wage increases, family allowances

and other re-distributive measures were relevant

to the improvement of the position of low-paid

workers. The improvement in children's allow

ances initiated in the last Budget was both rele

vant and welcome.

"We would hope," the report said, "that there

is general acceptance in the community of the

desirability of raising the standards of low-income

groups to a level in keeping with present-day

needs and this should be seen to be one of the

objectives of an incomes and prices policy".

The Federation of Irish Industries, the report

said, was dissatisfied with the present price control

by the Department of Industry and Commerce

and was concerned that price control might be

come "profit control." The F.U.E. held that it was

hard to justify interference with either prices or

profits in areas where full competition existed.

In the N.LE.C.'s view the need was to concen

trate attention mainly on areas where competition

was imperfect or non-existent and on ensuring

that price surveillance had the appropriate cover

age.

F.U.E. addendum

The three representatives of the F.U.E. on the

N.I.E.C., Mr. P. H. Gree, Mr. Charles R. Cuffe,

and Mr. Daniel McAuley, stated in an addendum

that they considered that the proposals in the

report would make a greater contribution to the

over-all objective of achieving a closer relationship

between the growth in money incomes and the

growth in output if they were accompanied by

arrangements which would assist in containing

industrial relations matters.

They said they were conscious of the views of

trade unions on such questions as intervention by

the State in collective bargaining, statutory wage

controls and compulsory arbitration. They respect

ed these views and to some extent snared the

concern of those who expressed reservations about

the value of legislation and legal sanctions in in

dustrial relations matters.

They believed, therefore, that the viability of an

incomes and prices policy on a purely voluntary

basis would ultimately depend on the willingness

of the parties engaged on collective bargaining to

renounce force as a means of securing short-term

sectional advantages.

The work of the N.I.E.C. in enunciating guide

lines for money incomes, the task of the new

employer-employee

body

in

translating

these

guide-lines into terms which would be operation

ally useful in collective bargaining and the investi

gations and findings of the Labour Court would

be of considerably greater value and significance if

there was a commitment by both sides of industry

to use only peaceful methods for resolving indus

trial disputes, the F.U.E. representative said.

They considered that such a national commit

ment should be made, limited if necessary to a

specified period, so that the present inflationary

pressures in the economy, to the extent to which

they were generated by excessive

increases

in

money incomes, could be reduced.

A statement issued by the Federated Union of

Employers welcomed the proposal that the State

17