Previous Page  574 / 736 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 574 / 736 Next Page
Page Background

SUMMARY OF

CORRESPONDENCE RE: PROPOSED

LANDLORD & TENANT BILL

The Council of the Dublin Solicitors Bar Associa

tion has been in correspondence with the Minister

for Justice regarding some difficulties which arose

out of the interpretation of the Statement issued

by the Government Information Bureau on be

half of the Minister for Justice on the 3rd March

1970 dealing with

the proposed Landlord &

Tenant Bill. The Statement was in the following-

form :

At a meeting of 3rd March, 1970, the Govern

ment considered the legislative proposals of the

Minister for Justice arising out of the Second

Report of the Landlord and Tenant Commission,

dealing with the question of extending leasehold

renewal rights and the right to purchase the fee

simple to new classes of tenants, including tenants

of land used for outdoor sports. The Government

approved of the Minister's proposals for imple

menting, with minor amendments,

the recom

mendations of

the Commission and authorised

the draft of the necessary Bill. Because, of neces

sity, some time must elapse before the proposals

approved by the Government take shape in legisla

tion, the Government have decided that the legis

lation should be expressed to operate from to-day

(3rd March, 1970). Accordingly, the Bill to be

placed before the Oireachtas will include a pro

vision to ensure that the benefits accruing under

the legislation will operate from 3 March, 1970,

even in the case of tenancies which in the ordinary

way would have terminated before the date of the

enactment of the proposed Act. The main legis

lative proposals approved by the Government are

as follows :

(1) Sports organisations who hold

land

for

recreational purposes will,

in certain circums

tances, be given the right to renew their tenancies.

To qualify, the club or organisation must hold the

land under a lease for 25 years, or, alternatively,

have occupied the land for 25 years out of the

preceding 40 years, and have expended 15 times

the rent or a minimum of £1,000 on the lands.

(2) The right to a reversionary lease (and the

right to purchase the fee simple) will be extended

to a new class of lessees holding under pre-1931

leases.

(3) The right to purchase the fee simple given

in the Ground Rents Act, 1967, will be extended

in certain cases to persons holding under leases

for 50 years or more (instead of 99 years or more).

(4) Tenants of vacant building land in built-

up areas will be given the right to acquire the fee

simple on the terms of purchase applicable to

ground rent leases, provided they have planning

permission to build.

(5) The rent on renewal of a ground rent

lease will be determined with due allowance for

improvements made by the tenant.

The proposed Bill will also cover changes in

the law arising out of the First Report of the

Landlord and Tenant Commission dealing with

occupational tenancies. The main changes pro

posed in the law as to occupational tenancies are

as follows :

(6) The tenancy on

renewal will be for 35

years, instead of the present 21 years, with pro-

vis on for a review of the rent by either landlord

or tenant every 7 years.

(7) A landlord will,

in certain circumstances

and on payment of compensation, be able to re

cover possession of buildings which are obsolete

or in an obsolete area before the lease expires.

(8) The requirements as to notice in relation

to compensation payable to a tenant for improve

ments made by him are to be relaxed, and so also

are the conditions which he must satisfy in order

to obtain a renewal of his tenancy.

Members of the profession found that two in

terpretations were being given to the Statement

in so far as its retrospective provisions were con

cerned, the first being that the retrospective pro

visions would only relate to legislative proposals

numbered 1

to 5 in the Statement and the second

being that they would relate to all eight pro

posals.

A second difficulty arose out of the interpreta

tion of paragraph 8 in the Statement, because it

was not clear whether the proposals would adopt

all the recommendations of the Report on Occu

pational Tenancies under the Landlord & Tenant

Act 1931 (PR. No. 9685) published in November

1967 and that if it were intended that proposals

numbered 6 and 7 would have retrospective effect

then it was of cardinal importance to practitioners

to know precisely what the proposals referred to

in paragraph 8 were before a solicitor could

advise his

landlord or tenant client as

to his

existing rights. Accordingly on the 30th July 1970

the Secretary of the Dublin Solicitors Bar Associa-