Previous Page  630 / 736 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 630 / 736 Next Page
Page Background

in the Physics Theatre at Earlsfort Terrace, Dub

lin, last night.

When a vacancy arose, he said, the Bar Council,

the

Incorporated Law Society and

the Chief

Justice should be enabled to submit three names

each for the post which would go, preferably, to

the person whose name was most mentioned. In

this way the Government would not be-deprived

of its power of decision, but neither would law

yers, regarded as being at the top of their pro

fession, be passed over.

Mr. MacBride said there was a danger under

the present system that the most competent law

yers might be passed over because the Govern

ment would naturally prefer to put in its own

supporters.

Earlier the Minister for Justice, Mr. O'Malley,

had replied to criticism by the Society's Auditor,

Mr. Colm Alien, of the present system of selecting

judges.

Mr. O'Malley asked were we quite sure that

any other sponsors or nominators would

be

purer, more free from bias, more responsive to

the feelings of the public than the Government.

Were they quite sure that we would get better

judges

if people nominated

to

the bench had

to run the gauntlet of a public inquisition? Were

they likely to get the best brains at the Bar to

accept that?

On legal aid, Mr. O'Malley said that, much as

he would like to do so, he could not at the present

time at all events bring in a scheme of legal aid in

civil cases.

He could not do so because the taxpayers' re

sources were limited and could not provide all

at once for everything they would like to provide.

Mr. Alien, speaking on "Justice and the Rule

of Law," had said: "The first guideline laid down

for a fair trial is that the judge should be absolute

ly independent of the Government. This is re

garded as an essential requirement for justice

under the rule of law. In agreeing wholeheartedly

with this principle, one is forced to admit that

under the system operating in this country at the

present time this is not clearly seen to be so.

"While not wishing to criticise any of the judi

ciary, who were rightly held in the highest esteem

by the legal profession and, indeed, by the gen

eral public, for their integrity, it had to be said

that the system of appointment to the Bench pre

scribed by our constitution was an undesirable

one.

"The position is that the Government nominates

a member of the legal profession, who is, in turn,

appointed by the President. I do not believe that it

should

be at

the discretion of a politically-

appointed body

to appoint members of

the

judiciary. I believe that it is an unhealthy system

which could be manipulated by an unscrupulous

government

to such an extent that we would

have a judiciary which would merely be an exten

sion of a particular political party."

VIOLENCE ON INCREASE

In an interview published in the December 10th

issue of a Swiss newspaper,

La Tribune de

Geneve,

Mr. Sean MacBride declares that certain

governments not only

tolerate but

encourage

brutality. Mr. MacBride has recently retired as

secretary-general of the International Commission

of Jurists, which has its seat in Geneva.

In the interview, Mr. MacBride says that the

past three years have seen a considerable escala

tion of violence. "In Brazil and Greece, torture

has become commonplace. It is used not only to

extort confessions but to terrorise the opposition.

They, in their turn, are pushed into reacting just

as violently, and thus we have all these plane

hijackings and kidnapping of diplomats which are

contraventions of human rights.

"Youth is losing faith in the sense of moral

responsibility of its elders".

Mr. MacBride proposes three courses of action

to enable the Universal Declaration of Human

Rights of 1948 to be applied. The first would be

to increase the number of courts, modelled on the

Strasbourg institution, where not only States but

also individuals could have grievances heard.

The second would set up an international judi

cial authority which would hear cases alleged to

have contravened the Hague and Geneva Con

ventions, and the Convention on Genocide.

The third would be the establishment of a high

commissioner of human rights whose main role

would be to help members of the United Nations

to activate the principles of the 1948 declaration.

170