Previous Page  666 / 736 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 666 / 736 Next Page
Page Background

LAND LAW REFORM PROPOSALS

IN NORTHERN IRELAND

by BRIAN HARVEY, M.A., LL.B., Solicitor

Senior Lecturer in Law, Queen's University,

Belfast.

Introduction

In .he course of his introductory remarks to a

lecture on Law Reform given by Sir Leslie

Scarman at Queen's University, Belfast, in 1970,

the learned judge quite rightly drew his audience's

attention to the enormous achievements in this

field of the nineteenth century. By comparison,

he suggested, law reform in the twentieth century

in England has been relatively unimpressive, with

the significant exception of the "Birkenhead"

legislation (primarily the Law of Property Acts

1922-1925, the Settled Land Act 1925 and the

Trustee and Administration of Estates Acts 1925).

Certainly if one surveys the progress made in the

reform of the land law in the nineteenth century

it is difficult to decide which legislative measure

has had the most far-reaching consequences. The

Settled Land Acts 1882-90 effectively freed huge

tracts of land from the shackles of the strict settle

ment so dear to the Victorian middle and upper

classes. The Conveyancing Acts of 1881 and 1882

supplied for the first time the detailed machinery

to enable conveyances to be brief and reasonably

comprehensible, the Solicitors' Remuneration Act

1881 at the same time providing by way of en

couragement that fees should be based on the

commission basis rather than on the length of the

document. On top of all this the Land Transfer

Act, 1897, by making registration of title com

pulsory in certain districts, put teeth into the title

registration system already the subject of legis

lation in 1862 and 1875. The 1862 Act was pre

ceded by a preamble which precisely defines the

aims of a successful conveyancing system: —

"Whereas it is expedient to give certainty

.

to the title to Real Estates, and to facilitate

the proof thereof, and also to render the

dealing with land more simple and econom

ical, be it enacted that, etc."

Over a hundred years later the recipe remains

the same despite the giant strides taken by the

nineteenth century reformers.

In 1925, besides further simplifying convey

ancing, the reforming measures abolished a num

ber of historical survivals (e.g. the Statute of Uses

1535, the rule in Shelley's Case, future interests)

and in a number of ways assimilated the law of

real property to that of personal property. The key

to this process is undoubtedly the over-reaching

device whereby a

large number of

interests

of a non-commercial character affecting

land

cease to encumber that land on a sale taking place,

and

instead attach

themselves to the purchase

money. As an essential corollary to this scheme

the number of legal estates (the title to which must

be investigated on transfer) were reduced to two,

the fee simple absolute in possession and the

term of years absolute, other interests being

equitable and behind a "curtain" beyond which

a purchaser may not investigate. Consequently

interests such as life estates became equitable, and

also over-reachable under the provisions of the

Settled Land Act 1925. Since 1926 in England it

can truly be said that the normal conveyancing

transaction presents few

if any difficulties of

theory. This is no doubt par^y due to the decline

in popularity of complex settlements, but it is also

a further tribute to this brilliant conceptual frame

work, the foundations of which were laid in the

nineteenth century and the final manifestation of

which occurred

in 1925.

Northern Ireland

In 1970 the substantive land law stood (and

still stands) in much the same position as that of

English law prior to the Birkenhead legislation.

Significant exceptions are the Administration of

Estates Act ,N.I.) 1955 (similar to the Adminis

tration of Estates Act 1925 (U.K.)), the Trustee

Act (N.I.) 1958 (almost identical to the Trustee

Act 1925 (U.K.), and the Perpetuities Act (N.I.)

1966 (similar to the Perpetuities and Accumul

ations Act 1964 (U.K.)). In addition, of course,

the substantive law of landlord and tenant had

been to a large extent codified in Ireland by

Deasy's Act (Landlord and Tenant Amendment

(Ireland) Act 1860).

Impetus was given to the idea of reform by the

appointment in 1958 of a Committee under the

chairmanship of Mr. Justice Lowry to examine

206