Background Image
Previous Page  35 / 98 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 35 / 98 Next Page
Page Background

Wire & Cable ASIA – November/December 2010

33

From the

americas

Steel

Chinese participation in a wind power

project in Texas has the blessing of the

United Steelworkers of America

An agreement between the United Steelworkers of America

and two Chinese clean energy companies apparently has

deflected potential controversy over the use of economic

stimulus money from Washington to subsidise foreign

companies.

The deal, announced 6

th

August, requires that all major

components of the machinery for a $1.5 billion wind farm in

Texas be made in the United States.

The elements to be sourced domestically include steel for

the wind towers, enclosures for working parts atop the

towers, and reinforcing bars for the bases. So also will

the blades be American-made, the union and the Chinese

companies said. Blades, or vanes, for wind turbines are not

fabricated of steel but are often made by steel workers.

The Chinese parties to the agreement with the labour

union are Shenyang Power Group, known as SPG, and

that company’s partly-owned subsidiary A-Power Energy

Generation Systems. They have formed a joint venture with

the American investment firm US Renewable Energy Group

to build the wind farm in West Texas.

When, in the fall of 2009, word spread that millions of

dollars in federal stimulus grants and loan guarantees for

clean energy initiatives might flow to the project, members

of Congress requested the Obama administration to deny

federal aid.

“Their chief worry was that the turbines would be

manufactured in Shenyang, China, rather than in the United

States,” wrote Matthew L Wald, a Washington reporter for

the

New York Times

. “[This] announcement seems likely to

allay some of those objections.” (“Wind Farm Deal Assures

Bigger US Role.” 6

th

August)

President Leo W Gerard of the United Steelworkers said

his union had been prepared to bring anti-dumping actions

against Chinese manufacturers of steel imported for wind

machines, as it has in the past over steel imports for other

uses. Now, the Chinese participants in the 615-megawatt

Texas project anticipate buying 50,000 tons of steel from

unionised American mills. They will also work to develop

an American supply chain for wind machine manufacture

beyond the Texas project, the union said.

The

Times

’s Mr Wald called attention to the expanding

globalisation of the wind machine industry, which utilises

parts made in various countries. Robert E Gramlich,

policy director at the American Wind Energy Assn, told

him that the “big heavy stuff” – ie towers and blades –

were generally most likely to be locally sourced; and that

smaller, higher-value components were more likely to

be imported. In the case of the Texas project, however,

the gear box, a high-value component, was always

to be manufactured by General Electric Co (Fairfield,

Connecticut).

Elsewhere in renewable energy . . .

Another project for making blades for wind turbines, this

one Canadian, is headed up by Siemens Canada which

expects to commission a plant for the purpose by late 2011,

in time for the 2012 construction season. Together with its

American partner Pattern Energy, Siemens will supply the

blades for a massive wind and solar power development in

the province of Ontario led by Samsung C&T Corp, of South

Korea. As reported by John Spears in the

Toronto Star

(10

th

August), in return for $437 million in subsidies over

25 years, Samsung and Korea Electric Power Co signed an

agreement with Ontario that requires them to build a total of

four plants there to make equipment for the generation of

wind and solar energy.

The big blades are intended for turbines that can generate

2.3 megawatts of power. The wind farms where they will be

installed will qualify for the province’s “feed-in tariff” rates,

paying on-shore wind farms 13.5 cents a kilowatt hour for

power. (When Mr Spears wrote, market prices had averaged

about 4c/kWh since 1

st

January, although high summertime

demand pushed rates briefly into the 12-cent range.)

As with the Chinese-US project in Texas, the sourcing of

steel was apparently a factor in the Canadian negotiations.

Siemens senior vice president Bill Smith told the

Star

that

the steel towers that support the blades will be made in

Ontario. While Samsung will be the key customer at first,

taking 300 or more blades, the South Korean company will

not have an exclusive on output. The new plant, Mr Smith

said, “would supply blades or turbines to whoever wanted

to install them.”

A Senate hopeful from a Rust Belt state

takes a contrarian view of US tariffs on

Chinese steel imports

The United Steelworkers of America also figured in coverage

of a special election being run in West Virginia to fill the two

years of the late Senator Robert C Byrd’s unexpired term.

Mr Byrd, a Democrat, was one of the Senate’s strongest

supporters of tariffs on steel imports from China.

Hoping to succeed him is John Raese, a Republican, who

has said he believes tariffs placed on steel imports during

the George W Bush administration have played a major role

in creating economic problems in the United States.

It was Sen Byrd’s conviction that the output of American

steel makers could not compete with imports from

countries with low wages, weak environmental regulations,

and government subsidies for steel mills. Mr Raese urges

concern for American manufacturers of steel products. In

a telephone interview with the Charleston (West Virginia)

Gazette-Mail

, he said, “When you have a tariff on all

imported steel, that allows domestic steel companies to

raise their costs to just below that tariff figure. Then we all

have to raise our prices.”

These views on steel tariffs, expressed at a midsummer

civic meeting in Wheeling, West Virginia, drew the ire of

the president of the United Steelworkers local. Calling

Mr Raese’s comments “outrageous,” Mark Glyptis said that

Statue of Liberty Image from BigStockPhoto.com

Photographer: Marty