Background Image
Previous Page  80 / 116 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 80 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

78

M

ay

2010

www.read-tpt.com

G

lobal

M

arketplace

Automotive

Beleaguered Toyota makes offers that cannot

be refused in the US, stresses concern for

safety in China

The ear on the

Automotive News

story (10 March) read “Toyota Recall

Crisis,” but the information conveyed was that unprecedented incentives

being offered by Toyota Motor Co – zero percent financing, subsidised

leases, free maintenance – were boosting the company’s US sales “big

time” in early March; and analysts forecast a 30% bounce for the full

month. The disjunction was not untypical of the Japanese car maker,

most of whose famously loyal American customers are better satisfied

with its products than some other interested parties – notably a federal

Cabinet department. The US Dept of Transportation is investigating

reports of 52 deaths resulting from unintended acceleration in Toyota

vehicles.

In January, Toyota said that it would be recalling 5.6 million vehicles

in the US, on complaints of problems great and small. On 9 March

the company said further that it would likely issue a recall on all Prius

models made between 2004 and 2009; and, on 10 March, that it will

expand its recall on Tundra pickups to include all 2000 to 2003 US

vehicles.

Even so, according to Toyota spokesman Win Finklehorn, Toyota is

trying moving forward into the new decade. “Our sales are up and so

is morale,” he told a press conference reported by the Huffington Post

(12 March). “We have no plans of slowing down.”

Toyota faces a steep climb if it is to regain its position as of 1 January

when it was the top-selling brand in the US, with a 14.3% market share

for all of 2009. By the end of February the company had gone to No. 3,

with 11%, indicating that Toyota loyalists cannot by themselves rescue

the company’s American fortunes. A restoration to dominance of the

US market clearly rests with new customers, who will need stronger

persuasion than ever before.

Given the obvious effectiveness of the incentives offered by Toyota

Motor Sales USA Inc in March, the company was considered likely to

extend them. But more than one observer noted that such sweeteners

have a short shelf-life. And, they are expensive, even for the world’s

largest auto maker by sales.

Many months or even years before Toyota’s troubles began, could

some intuition have inspired the company’s decision to sponsor an

extreme-heavy metal festival named for one of its models? The Scion

Rock Fest, held 13 March in Columbus, Ohio, and accorded high praise

by

New York Times

jazz and pop critic Ben Ratliff, could hardly be

surpassed for making friends and influencing people.

Mr. Ratliff noted that the event had enabled him to hear Yob – in his view

perhaps one of the best bands in North America – and hear it properly,

in a “festival with midsize clubs and good sound, surrounded by people

who didn’t have to pay admission and bands who’d been flown in, put

up in hotels, fed and allowed to play sets of at least an hour.” (“Metal

Variety: Death, Doom, Black and Cars,” 14 March)

As he need not have observed, none of that is usual at metal festivals.

This one offered free admission in four clubs on a stretch of a major

street, with staggered set times. The “satanic bargain” (apparently,

Toyota’s bid to call itself to the attention of the festival-goers) was that

the metal fans were offered “rivers of rather handsome Scion bags and

T-shirts, which of course they took with them on their endless back and

forth between Ohio State University and the [festival] neighbourhood.”

Struck by this “envelopment without hard sell,” the

Times

’s critic sought

to learn what Toyota hoped to gain from its extraordinary generosity.

The company would not grant interviews on the subject. It sent word

through an intermediary – the festival’s booker – that Toyota Motor Co

“wanted the music to speak for itself.”

While the US is an essential market for Toyota, it is by no means

its sole problem-child. In January, Toyota announced that it was

responding to reports of accelerator problems with the recall of up to

1.8 million cars across Europe, including about 220,000 in the United

Kingdom. And on 1 March, on his way back to Japan from Washington

where he testified at a congressional hearing, Toyota’s president

Akio Toyoda held a press conference in Beijing to try to shore up his

company’s share of its main market: China.

As reported by

Yomiuri Shimbun

staff writers Yasushi Kouchi and

Tomoko Echizenya, Mr Toyoda spoke to more than 400 reporters about

the massive recalls of his company’s vehicles worldwide; apologised;

and stressed the Toyota corporate principle of safety as a top priority. As

an indication of the interest taken by Chinese media in what he had to

say, the auto maker was obliged to arrange a second press conference

conducted in Japanese.

According to Daily Yomiuri Online, the news site of the Tokyo-based

paper, questions from the reporters gathered at the JW Marriott Hotel

Beijing focused on safety, such as whether Toyota planned to install

a brake override system in cars it builds for the Chinese market. A

reporter even asked whether the quality of Toyotas produced overseas

was lower than that of domestically produced cars.

The Yomiuri

reporters wrote, “[Mr Toyoda] carefully answered individual

questions.”

Pipelines

In a first-ever offer of its kind, the EC pledges

significant funding for the Nabucco gas

pipeline from Turkey to Austria

In what Günther Oettinger, the bloc’s commissioner for energy, termed

a “milestone” for European energy policy, the European Commission on

4 March pledged $273 million for a pipeline that would start delivering

gas westward by around 2015 from the Caspian Sea region, bypassing

Russia and Ukraine.

“We’re not just supporting an idea any more, we’re talking about

funding,” Mr Oettinger said in a news conference in Brussels.

In the first instance of an EC offer of money for the construction phase

of a gas pipeline, intended to avoid future crises over supplies, the

pledge was significant in another respect: it suggests movement away

from the commission’s stated goal of encouraging the development of

biofuels, at least for the time being.

Europe is only too well aware of the geopolitical and environmental risks

of fuel dependency. It has apparently decided to address those risks by

traditional means.

The pipeline, the Nabucco project, would stretch more than 2,000

miles from Turkey, across Bulgaria and Romania, to Austria. Its cost is

estimated at $10.9 billion, or about 40 times the sum pledged in March.

But Mr Oettinger said the offer still represented a “trump card on the

table” for Nabucco, and he is probably right. Certainly it puts pressure

on the backers of the pipeline, including RWE of Germany and OMV of