Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  125 / 144 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 125 / 144 Next Page
Page Background

123

to visit any place under the jurisdiction and control of the State party where persons

are or may be deprived of their liberty (the above mentioned detention facilities), and

to cooperate with the national preventive mechanisms and with other international

mechanisms, with a unifying objective to strengthen the prevention of torture and ill-

treatment, and reinforce the rights of persons deprived of their liberty. He claims that

the protocol defines in some detail the mandate of the Subcommittee, however the

response to a number of significant related issues derives only from its practice. He also

claims that the visits have already resulted in adoption or changes of laws or internal

regulations as well as changes in practice that contributed to the strengthening of the

legal safeguards for persons deprived of their liberty. In some cases, the Subcommittee

even achieved the closure of outdated detention facilities. Based on the findings of

the Czech Public Defender of Rights,

Marie Lukasová

identifies several kinds of

failures in protection against ill-treatment and claims that the type of deprivation of

liberty partly determines the nature of ill-treatment, and she considers how to handle

those findings. The article introduces several examples of follow-up activities of the

Defender, aiming to achieve the prevention of ill-treatment by tools different from the

monitoring. She claims that special attention needs to be paid to the role of doctor and

judge.

Petr Šustek

discusses selected aspects of the provision of health services in the

Czech Republic and identifies the most controversial practices of the contemporary

Czech healthcare system, such as the use of means of restraint, particularly net-beds,

inadequate supervision of the security of patients under restraints, and the use of

surgical castration in the context of the treatment of sex offenders. He analyses these

cases within the prism of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights.

The

fourth and last chapter

is comprised of two articles focusing on the practice

within the Council of Europe States Parties.

Alla Tymofeyeva

elaborates on the

relationship between the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and the

European Court of Human Rights. She focuses on the references to CPT’s documents

in the Court’s case-law.

Viktor Kundrák

and

Petr Konůpka

focus on two recent

judgments of the European Court of Human Rights against the Czech Republic where

there was found a violation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights

in its substantive and procedural aspects. In both cases the applicants were subjected

to inhuman or degrading treatment during their deprivation of liberty. The authors

discuss the practical use of criminal law in the fight against ill-treatment and propose

possible solutions to the identified lacunas.